Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 319 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
15901 CI ELITE 16-RED 1546 28-33 46% 16 IL
15902 Platform 17-Molten 1546 30-21 57% 17 IA
15903 Coqui Coast 12 1546 28-19 60% 12 AL
15904 Top Flight 15-Gamma 1546 4-1 80% 15 IL
15905 NC Select 17-Frombaugh 1546 4-1 80% 17 OH
15906 LAVA 15-1tyler 1546 15-11 58% 15 NC
15907 A5 14 Jeannie 1546 45-32 58% 14 GA
15908 Rose City Netters 12-Jen 1546 3-1 75% 12 WY
15909 Stars Columbia 14 Jim 1546 25-16 61% 14 SC
15910 RAGE 15-Cat 1546 20-18 53% 15 CA
15911 CHAOS 14-3 black regional 1546 14-8 64% 14 OR
15912 C2 16-3 reg blue hannah 1546 17-14 55% 16 TN
15913 Asphalt Green Volleyball Club 13-Green 1546 14-21 40% 13 NY
15914 YAVBC 14 1546 3-1 75% 14 SD
15915 STVA 16-Red-1 1546 29-31 48% 16 TX
15916 Club Velocity YDT 11-Blue 1546 2-1 67% 11 MN
15917 CHAOS 14-4 burgundy 1546 16-6 73% 14 OR
15918 SMCJV 15-Blue 1546 18-11 56% 15 MD
15919 TXP 12-RED 1546 14-14 40% 12 TX
15920 Durham Rebels Volleyball Club 13 Durham Rebels Tano 1546 4-1 80% 13 ON
15921 BSVBC 16-Luechtefeld 1546 26-12 67% 16 IL
15922 Waseca Fusion 12-Wangen 1546 3-2 60% 12 MN
15923 Little Red Volleyball Club 18 Little Red Inferno (XL) 1546 8-5 42% 18 NY
15924 Illini NW 13U Pink 1546 18-9 64% 13 IL
15925 Whirlwind VBC 15-1 1546 14-14 47% 15 NY
15926 SVC Summit 16-1 1546 29-26 53% 16 GA
15927 SC Legends 11-Nike 1546 23-17 57% 11 CA
15928 CVC 16-Navy 1546 23-19 50% 16 ND
15929 Mill City 12 1546 17-14 55% 12 MA
15930 RVA 13-Spencer 1546 23-21 52% 13 IA
15931 Club 217 14-Sydney 1546 14-8 64% 14 IL
15932 865VB 17-BLUE 1546 20-15 57% 17 TN
15933 CSV 15-2 1546 4-3 57% 15 WA
15934 Dubuque Legacy 13U 1546 19-13 51% 13 IA
15935 NIVA 12-Purple 1546 2-3 40% 12 IN
15936 MOJO Elite Volleyball 15-Pink 1546 17-19 45% 15 VA
15937 Sky High 14-Vangerven - spr 1546 8-6 57% 14 IL
15938 Junior Jays 16-White 1546 3-1 50% 16 MN
15939 NLVA 16-Girouard 1546 18-24 41% 16 MO
15940 314 VBC 13-Red 1546 44-22 65% 13 MO
15941 APV 12-Regional black 1546 14-13 42% 12 TX
15942 NET 17-Force 1546 20-19 51% 17 NY
15943 BVA 14-N katie 1546 27-37 42% 14 FL
15944 CUVC 12 Open 1546 24-36 39% 12 NC
15945 NE Elite 16-Prime 1546 18-23 44% 16 NE
15946 Cangrejeras 16-Openjeffrey 1546 3-8 27% 16 PR
15947 Eclipse 15-Solar 1546 35-18 66% 15 WI
15948 All Out 15-Anna 1546 18-11 62% 15 WA
15949 Alamo 13-Black 1546 26-19 58% 13 TX
15950 HV United VBC 14-Red 1546 17-13 55% 14 MI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.