2025-2026 Season — Page 309 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15401 | Aim High 12 Aim HIgh Jordyn / Kelly (MI) | 1551 | 17-12 | 59% | 12 | |
| 15402 | Nova Northeast 16 | 1551 | 6-2 | 67% | 16 | PA |
| 15403 | Dominicos PR 15-2 zayas | 1551 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | FL |
| 15404 | Academy North 16-Hp-1 | 1551 | 43-55 | 44% | 16 | CA |
| 15405 | SPVA 17-2 | 1551 | 8-8 | 50% | 17 | MN |
| 15406 | Dub City Sports 17 Dub City 18- (KE) (4) | 1551 | 4-1 | 80% | 17 | PA |
| 15407 | Lex United 12 Elite | 1551 | 33-37 | 47% | 12 | KY |
| 15408 | Maunalani 16-Anela | 1551 | 21-16 | 57% | 16 | HI |
| 15409 | ADSV 10-Dev - 1 | 1551 | 6-7 | 35% | 10 | TX |
| 15410 | Courthouse 13-Blue | 1551 | 22-16 | 58% | 13 | OR |
| 15411 | Rise 15-1 (MA) | 1551 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | MA |
| 15412 | Ridgeland Reds-Red 14 | 1551 | 19-15 | 56% | 14 | WI |
| 15413 | Rolling Thunder 13-Crimson | 1551 | 21-14 | 60% | 13 | IL |
| 15414 | Belle Plaine 12-Black | 1551 | 6-5 | 50% | 12 | MN |
| 15415 | 573 Missouri Juniors 14-1 | 1551 | 2-2 | 50% | 14 | MO |
| 15416 | Aspire 14-Premier | 1551 | 33-33 | 50% | 14 | AZ |
| 15417 | Zero Gravity 12-Black | 1551 | 6-5 | 55% | 12 | OH |
| 15418 | LAVA Shack 13 Premier | 1551 | 31-35 | 47% | 13 | CA |
| 15419 | STRIKE 13-Red | 1551 | 29-21 | 58% | 13 | AZ |
| 15420 | TVC 10-Black | 1551 | 14-9 | 61% | 10 | OH |
| 15421 | 287 SVC 16-Navy | 1551 | 15-9 | 56% | 16 | |
| 15422 | Cornerstone 14 | 1551 | 14-12 | 54% | 14 | CA |
| 15423 | WACO VBC 13-Ua black | 1551 | 17-21 | 45% | 13 | TX |
| 15424 | Cape Elite 17 Anthony | 1551 | 10-38 | 21% | 17 | FL |
| 15425 | PCVC 13-Mireya | 1551 | 10-11 | 48% | 13 | NC |
| 15426 | FLX Waves 17-1 | 1551 | 14-9 | 50% | 17 | NY |
| 15427 | Niagara Frontier 15-White | 1551 | 10-11 | 38% | 15 | NY |
| 15428 | Colorado Juniors 14-Black | 1551 | 27-28 | 49% | 14 | CO |
| 15429 | Legacy 14 National | 1551 | 31-20 | 61% | 14 | NY |
| 15430 | DBQ Insanity Heat 12 | 1551 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | IA |
| 15431 | KPV 14-Blue - emma | 1551 | 15-14 | 52% | 14 | KY |
| 15432 | AAVC 13 club | 1551 | 18-11 | 62% | 13 | AL |
| 15433 | Club 217 13-Mary | 1551 | 10-10 | 50% | 13 | IL |
| 15434 | Mid City VBC 14-Black | 1551 | 14-7 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 15435 | Wolfpack 18-Uw | 1551 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | TX |
| 15436 | EXCEL 14-Gold | 1551 | 18-21 | 43% | 14 | TX |
| 15437 | Raiders VBC 14 (GP) | 1551 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | IA |
| 15438 | MINI 15-Elite rafa red nva | 1551 | 3-1 | 75% | 15 | FL |
| 15439 | Direction 15-White | 1551 | 35-15 | 70% | 15 | NC |
| 15440 | HP 14-2 | 1551 | 21-23 | 48% | 14 | MI |
| 15441 | Warriors 16 | 1551 | 3-1 | 75% | 16 | FL |
| 15442 | NOVA Juniors 14-S maroon | 1551 | 8-3 | 73% | 14 | OH |
| 15443 | POVBC 15-1 | 1551 | 5-1 | 83% | 15 | OH |
| 15444 | 2Legit 14-Hybrid | 1551 | 13-6 | 68% | 14 | FL |
| 15445 | PowerPlex 10-Sieck | 1551 | 5-3 | 56% | 10 | IA |
| 15446 | Actyve 14-Blue | 1551 | 26-15 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 15447 | EVA 15-Blackshirts | 1551 | 17-17 | 50% | 15 | CO |
| 15448 | Brandywine Volleyball Club 15-1 | 1551 | 17-22 | 44% | 15 | DE |
| 15449 | Grandlake 13-Spaulding | 1551 | 3-1 | 75% | 13 | OH |
| 15450 | DCVC 11-National | 1551 | 11-13 | 44% | 11 | IA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.