Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 309 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
15401 Aim High 12 Aim HIgh Jordyn / Kelly (MI) 1551 17-12 59% 12
15402 Nova Northeast 16 1551 6-2 67% 16 PA
15403 Dominicos PR 15-2 zayas 1551 6-2 75% 15 FL
15404 Academy North 16-Hp-1 1551 43-55 44% 16 CA
15405 SPVA 17-2 1551 8-8 50% 17 MN
15406 Dub City Sports 17 Dub City 18- (KE) (4) 1551 4-1 80% 17 PA
15407 Lex United 12 Elite 1551 33-37 47% 12 KY
15408 Maunalani 16-Anela 1551 21-16 57% 16 HI
15409 ADSV 10-Dev - 1 1551 6-7 35% 10 TX
15410 Courthouse 13-Blue 1551 22-16 58% 13 OR
15411 Rise 15-1 (MA) 1551 6-2 75% 15 MA
15412 Ridgeland Reds-Red 14 1551 19-15 56% 14 WI
15413 Rolling Thunder 13-Crimson 1551 21-14 60% 13 IL
15414 Belle Plaine 12-Black 1551 6-5 50% 12 MN
15415 573 Missouri Juniors 14-1 1551 2-2 50% 14 MO
15416 Aspire 14-Premier 1551 33-33 50% 14 AZ
15417 Zero Gravity 12-Black 1551 6-5 55% 12 OH
15418 LAVA Shack 13 Premier 1551 31-35 47% 13 CA
15419 STRIKE 13-Red 1551 29-21 58% 13 AZ
15420 TVC 10-Black 1551 14-9 61% 10 OH
15421 287 SVC 16-Navy 1551 15-9 56% 16
15422 Cornerstone 14 1551 14-12 54% 14 CA
15423 WACO VBC 13-Ua black 1551 17-21 45% 13 TX
15424 Cape Elite 17 Anthony 1551 10-38 21% 17 FL
15425 PCVC 13-Mireya 1551 10-11 48% 13 NC
15426 FLX Waves 17-1 1551 14-9 50% 17 NY
15427 Niagara Frontier 15-White 1551 10-11 38% 15 NY
15428 Colorado Juniors 14-Black 1551 27-28 49% 14 CO
15429 Legacy 14 National 1551 31-20 61% 14 NY
15430 DBQ Insanity Heat 12 1551 3-2 60% 12 IA
15431 KPV 14-Blue - emma 1551 15-14 52% 14 KY
15432 AAVC 13 club 1551 18-11 62% 13 AL
15433 Club 217 13-Mary 1551 10-10 50% 13 IL
15434 Mid City VBC 14-Black 1551 14-7 67% 14 CA
15435 Wolfpack 18-Uw 1551 4-3 57% 18 TX
15436 EXCEL 14-Gold 1551 18-21 43% 14 TX
15437 Raiders VBC 14 (GP) 1551 3-2 60% 14 IA
15438 MINI 15-Elite rafa red nva 1551 3-1 75% 15 FL
15439 Direction 15-White 1551 35-15 70% 15 NC
15440 HP 14-2 1551 21-23 48% 14 MI
15441 Warriors 16 1551 3-1 75% 16 FL
15442 NOVA Juniors 14-S maroon 1551 8-3 73% 14 OH
15443 POVBC 15-1 1551 5-1 83% 15 OH
15444 2Legit 14-Hybrid 1551 13-6 68% 14 FL
15445 PowerPlex 10-Sieck 1551 5-3 56% 10 IA
15446 Actyve 14-Blue 1551 26-15 63% 14 CA
15447 EVA 15-Blackshirts 1551 17-17 50% 15 CO
15448 Brandywine Volleyball Club 15-1 1551 17-22 44% 15 DE
15449 Grandlake 13-Spaulding 1551 3-1 75% 13 OH
15450 DCVC 11-National 1551 11-13 44% 11 IA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.