2025-2026 Season — Page 289 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14401 | Starlings West Tucson 16-Blue | 1563 | 28-23 | 54% | 16 | AZ |
| 14402 | Roadrunner 14-Crimson | 1563 | 29-27 | 52% | 14 | TX |
| 14403 | PEAK 13-5 | 1563 | 12-6 | 67% | 13 | OK |
| 14404 | Roseville Juniors 14-3 | 1563 | 2-0 | 100% | 14 | MN |
| 14405 | MARIN 14-Fire | 1563 | 30-30 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 14406 | Roanoke United 12-White | 1563 | 19-9 | 68% | 12 | VA |
| 14407 | Dakine 14-Regional navy | 1563 | 27-13 | 68% | 14 | WA |
| 14408 | 808 AC 18-Albert | 1563 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | HI |
| 14409 | ACE Volleyball Academy 14 ACE Volleyball Academy | 1563 | 18-13 | 58% | 14 | CA |
| 14410 | CJVA 15-Black | 1563 | 36-36 | 50% | 15 | NJ |
| 14411 | Bullitt 17-S | 1563 | 16-16 | 50% | 17 | TX |
| 14412 | LVL 17 AVERY | 1563 | 10-13 | 43% | 17 | LA |
| 14413 | BVA 14-S | 1563 | 12-7 | 63% | 14 | MN |
| 14414 | KOKUA 17 | 1563 | 19-35 | 35% | 17 | WA |
| 14415 | HHVBC 12-1g | 1563 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | IA |
| 14416 | VVA 14-Cunha | 1563 | 24-19 | 56% | 14 | CA |
| 14417 | Genesis Athletics Club Kelowna 15-Girls phoenix | 1563 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | |
| 14418 | Absolute SubZero BVC U13/U 14-Cosmics | 1563 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | WA |
| 14419 | Platform 15-Black | 1563 | 45-29 | 58% | 15 | MD |
| 14420 | Junior Mints 12-Orange | 1563 | 8-4 | 57% | 12 | TX |
| 14421 | BRUSA 15-2 madison/des | 1563 | 6-5 | 55% | 15 | CA |
| 14422 | AR VC 13-1 | 1563 | 7-5 | 58% | 13 | GA |
| 14423 | SWKS High Performance 16 SWKS High Performance | 1563 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | KS |
| 14424 | Ne Jrs 16-Red | 1563 | 15-18 | 45% | 16 | NE |
| 14425 | Momentum Volleyball 14-Zoe | 1563 | 23-26 | 47% | 14 | CO |
| 14426 | MTNVC 14 | 1563 | 19-12 | 61% | 14 | NC |
| 14427 | MAVS KC 13 Regional | 1563 | 13-10 | 57% | 13 | KS |
| 14428 | Quandomania Girls 14U | 1563 | 20-11 | 63% | 14 | NJ |
| 14429 | FPVC 16-Ren | 1563 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | NV |
| 14430 | Mountain State Storm Volleyball Club 14 14 Blizzard (OV) | 1563 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | WV |
| 14431 | Allegiance 14-1 liberty | 1563 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | TX |
| 14432 | Local Girl 11-S | 1563 | 25-17 | 60% | 11 | SC |
| 14433 | Florida Conquer 13-National | 1563 | 30-25 | 55% | 13 | FL |
| 14434 | Madtown 15-2 select | 1563 | 23-21 | 52% | 15 | WI |
| 14435 | P3R 16-Th street | 1563 | 15-10 | 60% | 16 | PA |
| 14436 | adidas DYNASTY 15-4 | 1563 | 2-2 | 33% | 15 | KS |
| 14437 | Whirlwind 15-Elite | 1563 | 13-10 | 57% | 15 | NY |
| 14438 | 316VBC 15-Red | 1563 | 6-4 | 60% | 15 | KS |
| 14439 | BC Rise 11 Adidas | 1563 | 17-11 | 57% | 11 | TX |
| 14440 | Intense 13-S - ava b | 1563 | 28-22 | 55% | 13 | LA |
| 14441 | Mountain View Volleyball Club 14 MVVC 1 | 1563 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | WY |
| 14442 | Future Lady Knights 10 | 1563 | 3-1 | 75% | 10 | IA |
| 14443 | River City 11-Blue | 1563 | 19-11 | 63% | 11 | WI |
| 14444 | Manhattan Mayhem 13-P | 1563 | 4-4 | 50% | 13 | KS |
| 14445 | Reign Volleyball 11-Grey | 1563 | 13-4 | 76% | 11 | FL |
| 14446 | Adidas OPV 16-1 national | 1563 | 22-17 | 56% | 16 | OR |
| 14447 | Monon 15-4r slash | 1563 | 28-16 | 64% | 15 | IN |
| 14448 | NS Lancers Pink 16-G | 1563 | 4-2 | 50% | 16 | IA |
| 14449 | Net Force 18-1 elite | 1563 | 6-3 | 60% | 18 | IA |
| 14450 | BVC 12-Regional - shak | 1563 | 14-9 | 61% | 12 | AL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.