Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 287 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
14301 SVBC Spirit 11-Teal 1564 3-2 60% 11 IA
14302 MSVB 16-2national 1564 11-11 50% 16 AK
14303 Idaho LUV 13-Kaylee/morgan 1564 6-12 27% 13 ID
14304 AP 12-Lite highlighter 1564 12-3 80% 12 TX
14305 Spiketown VBC 10-3 1564 4-2 67% 10 OH
14306 Chi City 12-2 regional 1564 15-6 71% 12 IL
14307 CinciVB Acad 11-Ritenbaugh 1564 6-5 55% 11 OH
14308 United 12 GJ 1564 7-4 64% 12 CO
14309 ProPlay 15 Amelia 1564 26-22 54% 15 CA
14310 Panther Girls 17-Black 1564 29-21 58% 17 CO
14311 Six Pack 12 1564 12-7 52% 12 IA
14312 TX VISION 16 1564 20-20 50% 16 TX
14313 Pacific Northwest TL Volleyball 14 Pacific Northwest TL Volleyball 1564 26-18 59% 14 WA
14314 JNVBC 16-E teal 1564 24-12 65% 16 IA
14315 KPV 13-White-zoie 1564 25-17 60% 13 KY
14316 Sunshine 11-Hurricanes 1564 21-19 53% 11 CA
14317 Metro Volleyball Club 17-North 1564 30-26 53% 17 DC
14318 HP Illinois 14-1 silver 1564 23-18 56% 14 MO
14319 Eastside FCA 14-Ao1 1564 30-21 57% 14 OR
14320 PVA 12 National 1564 17-15 53% 12 MO
14321 Oiler Attack 17-Black 1564 12-9 57% 17 OH
14322 SF Stars 15 1564 30-28 52% 15 CA
14323 MVP 17-Platinum 1564 16-10 62% 17 OH
14324 Grandlake 11-Kramer 1564 3-1 75% 11 OH
14325 Madtown 11-Red 1564 6-2 75% 11 WI
14326 FTL 14-Fusion open-usa olivia 1564 3-2 60% 14 FL
14327 808 Athletic Club 10-Co-ed white 1564 8-3 73% 10 HI
14328 Iowa Impact 17-1 premier 1564 19-12 59% 17 IA
14329 AVC 16-Blue 1564 2-4 33% 16 NE
14330 BG's DVA Nationals 18-1 1564 3-2 60% 18 IA
14331 MWP 16 Gold 1564 38-16 69% 16 MN
14332 Central VBC 17-1 1564 5-2 71% 17 NV
14333 Mile High Warriors 12 1564 11-10 52% 12 CO
14334 CB Elite 14-Red 1564 5-2 71% 14 WA
14335 Sideout 15 1564 18-16 53% 15 WA
14336 Island Girls 16-1 1564 13-6 68% 16 FL
14337 ENVY 15-Green 1564 9-5 64% 15 IA
14338 Clarksville VBC 13-Jenny j 1564 30-23 56% 13 TN
14339 CVC 16 10 1564 5-4 56% 10 GA
14340 Southern Pines Volleyball Club 12 SPVC Loblolly Pine 1564 6-1 86% 12 GA
14341 Phoenix G17-Red 1564 19-17 53% 17 OH
14342 FaR Out 17-Red 1564 26-14 65% 17 MI
14343 OVA 13-Blue 1564 38-27 58% 13 FL
14344 Edge Elite 13-Gold 1564 6-3 67% 13 PA
14345 MDC Volley 12-Regional 1564 11-4 73% 12 OR
14346 OK Charge 15 West 1564 27-13 66% 15 OK
14347 Illini United 15 1564 12-9 57% 15 IL
14348 FIEL 12 1564 17-6 74% 12 MX
14349 Four1Nine Xtreme 12 12-Kleman (OV) 1564 4-1 80% 12 OH
14350 Ace VBA 12-Janice 1564 14-6 70% 12 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.