2025-2026 Season — Page 261 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13001 | Allons 16-Tish | 1580 | 25-14 | 60% | 16 | LA |
| 13002 | Country Fire 18 | 1580 | 3-0 | 100% | 18 | TX |
| 13003 | Greater Cincinnati Volleyball Club 18 18-Shafer | 1580 | 16-6 | 73% | 18 | OH |
| 13004 | COAST 14-R4 joseph | 1580 | 14-7 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 13005 | Erie Elite Hannah 18 | 1580 | 23-10 | 70% | 18 | OH |
| 13006 | AVA TX 14-Power | 1580 | 14-8 | 64% | 14 | TX |
| 13007 | SFSVC 15-1 brie | 1580 | 29-11 | 73% | 15 | NM |
| 13008 | NFC 16-1 | 1580 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | FL |
| 13009 | CJV 14-Local+ blue | 1580 | 6-3 | 67% | 14 | NC |
| 13010 | TRUE VBC 14-1 | 1580 | 18-10 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 13011 | SKYNT 14-Blue | 1580 | 27-15 | 64% | 14 | KY |
| 13012 | SSVBC 12-1 | 1580 | 16-9 | 64% | 12 | MA |
| 13013 | Crank It 13-Black | 1580 | 23-14 | 62% | 13 | MI |
| 13014 | Goshen 12-Hartsough | 1580 | 5-1 | 83% | 12 | IN |
| 13015 | Franklin Flight 15U | 1580 | 15-10 | 60% | 15 | IN |
| 13016 | Velocity 15-Red 1 | 1580 | 13-7 | 65% | 15 | MS |
| 13017 | VVA 14-Alarcon | 1580 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | CA |
| 13018 | Presidío Vortex 15 | 1580 | 18-7 | 72% | 15 | TX |
| 13019 | Anthem United 16-Agape | 1580 | 29-10 | 73% | 16 | GA |
| 13020 | KODA 16 Select | 1580 | 24-19 | 56% | 16 | NY |
| 13021 | Skyline 13-Silver cree | 1580 | 26-17 | 54% | 13 | TX |
| 13022 | Wisconsin Elite 12-Elite | 1580 | 18-15 | 55% | 12 | WI |
| 13023 | Delaware Juniors 14-Ace | 1580 | 26-22 | 54% | 14 | PA |
| 13024 | RRIV 13 Regional | 1580 | 22-14 | 56% | 13 | ND |
| 13025 | Aspire NW 14-2 royal | 1580 | 20-20 | 50% | 14 | OR |
| 13026 | ICE U12 Premier | 1580 | 14-10 | 58% | 12 | WA |
| 13027 | ACT 16-Ashley | 1580 | 19-14 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 13028 | Networks Academy 16-1 | 1580 | 21-16 | 55% | 16 | AL |
| 13029 | West Coast VBC 16-1 | 1580 | 7-30 | 19% | 16 | OR |
| 13030 | FH 17-Alaka'i-ray | 1580 | 14-16 | 44% | 17 | TX |
| 13031 | SSWolfpack 18-Alphas | 1580 | 20-16 | 56% | 18 | MA |
| 13032 | Club One AZ 15-Titanium | 1580 | 36-38 | 49% | 15 | AZ |
| 13033 | PVA 13-3 | 1580 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | MO |
| 13034 | Club Idaho 15-Blue | 1580 | 10-14 | 42% | 15 | ID |
| 13035 | EMV 17-National black sadie | 1580 | 4-4 | 50% | 17 | TX |
| 13036 | TAV Houston 15-White | 1580 | 20-23 | 47% | 15 | TX |
| 13037 | DBQ Insanity 14-3 grey | 1580 | 14-12 | 54% | 14 | IA |
| 13038 | WPVC 16-Armour silver | 1580 | 37-34 | 52% | 16 | FL |
| 13039 | NPJ Seattle 12 National | 1580 | 37-32 | 54% | 12 | WA |
| 13040 | Elite Level Volleyball 14 | 1580 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | NC |
| 13041 | RTR JO VB 12 | 1580 | 8-4 | 57% | 12 | SD |
| 13042 | HVC 16-2 strive | 1580 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | ON |
| 13043 | SCBandits 14-1 | 1580 | 18-8 | 69% | 14 | ON |
| 13044 | eteva 14-1 | 1580 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | |
| 13045 | Venom Pythons 13 Venom Pythons (CA) | 1580 | 6-2 | 75% | 13 | |
| 13046 | CVA 11 | 1580 | 14-12 | 52% | 11 | LA |
| 13047 | Club Idaho 14-Blue | 1579 | 4-5 | 33% | 14 | ID |
| 13048 | NCISVBC 17-1 | 1579 | 16-28 | 36% | 17 | IN |
| 13049 | UEPA 17-G | 1579 | 8-16 | 32% | 17 | TX |
| 13050 | Central Oregon COVC 15-National | 1579 | 5-4 | 56% | 15 | NV |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.