Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 259 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
12901 Adrenaline 11-Beth 1581 14-6 54% 11 IA
12902 TNT 13 Buggs 1581 17-15 53% 13 PA
12903 Pgh Elite 18-Premier 1581 25-26 49% 18 PA
12904 High Voltage 12-Black 1581 14-6 70% 12 MN
12905 Yakima Elite 18-Premier 1581 19-12 61% 18 WA
12906 Dinamite 18-BRYAUNEA 1581 7-6 54% 18 CA
12907 NorthShore 12-Ck 1581 12-5 71% 12 OH
12908 Cyclones 12-E chaparrals 1581 25-13 60% 12 IL
12909 MiElite 12-National east 1581 16-7 70% 12 MI
12910 MAVS 816 14-3 1581 13-2 76% 14 KS
12911 CGSV 12-Zicha 1581 4-1 80% 12 OH
12912 Princeton 16-Blue 1581 15-18 45% 16 NJ
12913 Legends Volleyball Club 14 Stringfellow (OV) 1581 7-4 64% 14 PR
12914 Crystal City Pearls 14 1581 3-2 60% 14 NY
12915 Mavericks 14-Elite 1581 25-12 68% 14 MI
12916 Waco Lightning 14-Black 1581 13-10 50% 14 TX
12917 MPV 12-National green 1581 28-25 52% 12 UT
12918 C2 Sports 17-Crown 1581 27-19 59% 17 TN
12919 Club Cactus 13-Navy 1581 21-7 75% 13 AZ
12920 Fusion 17-White 1581 38-40 49% 17 PA
12921 Legends Zenith 15-30 1581 3-2 60% 15 OH
12922 Fresno Heat HEAT 13-Travel robert 1581 17-10 63% 13 CA
12923 The Edge 16 Maroon 1581 35-28 56% 16 CO
12924 WSRVC 17-Thompson 1581 7-15 32% 17 WY
12925 NW Stars 14-Black 1581 11-6 65% 14 WI
12926 Illini United 12 1581 15-9 63% 12 IL
12927 Bourbon City 13-1 1581 20-10 67% 13 KY
12928 NYC Volleyball Academy 14-Noho 1581 24-13 65% 14 NY
12929 Eastlake 14-Michael 1581 6-2 75% 14 CA
12930 Club 1 18-Skronkstrong 1581 9-21 30% 18 IL
12931 Tenacity 11-1 1581 11-5 69% 11 WI
12932 Phoenix 12-Orange 1581 6-5 55% 12 OH
12933 360 15-1 1581 16-10 53% 15 NV
12934 Amarillo Xtreme 16 Ambush 1581 15-15 50% 16 TX
12935 GSEVC 15-National blue 1581 22-14 61% 15 NJ
12936 City Beach 16-Anna 1581 4-1 80% 16 CA
12937 Ta'ahine AZ Club 16 Ta'ahine AZ TAPU LULULULU 1581 4-1 80% 16 AZ
12938 Balboa Bay 14-Blue 1581 26-20 57% 14 CA
12939 RVC 14-1 1581 3-2 60% 14 WY
12940 Kairos 15-Black 1581 36-21 63% 15 SD
12941 Mizuno M1 17-2 1581 35-38 48% 17 MN
12942 ND Elite 18-Gold 1581 7-3 70% 18 ND
12943 Texas United 14-Navy 1581 27-21 55% 14 TX
12944 SC Legends 16-Nike 1581 29-23 56% 16 CA
12945 City 16-Blue 1581 24-27 47% 16 CA
12946 Playeros 14-1 andres 1581 27-15 64% 14 FL
12947 CGSV 15-Piccolini 1581 19-15 56% 15 OH
12948 NSSC 15-Black 1581 30-15 63% 15 MO
12949 Patriots 14-S 1581 3-1 75% 14 MN
12950 White Hawks 12-1 1581 2-0 100% 12 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.