2025-2026 Season — Page 259 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12901 | Adrenaline 11-Beth | 1581 | 14-6 | 54% | 11 | IA |
| 12902 | TNT 13 Buggs | 1581 | 17-15 | 53% | 13 | PA |
| 12903 | Pgh Elite 18-Premier | 1581 | 25-26 | 49% | 18 | PA |
| 12904 | High Voltage 12-Black | 1581 | 14-6 | 70% | 12 | MN |
| 12905 | Yakima Elite 18-Premier | 1581 | 19-12 | 61% | 18 | WA |
| 12906 | Dinamite 18-BRYAUNEA | 1581 | 7-6 | 54% | 18 | CA |
| 12907 | NorthShore 12-Ck | 1581 | 12-5 | 71% | 12 | OH |
| 12908 | Cyclones 12-E chaparrals | 1581 | 25-13 | 60% | 12 | IL |
| 12909 | MiElite 12-National east | 1581 | 16-7 | 70% | 12 | MI |
| 12910 | MAVS 816 14-3 | 1581 | 13-2 | 76% | 14 | KS |
| 12911 | CGSV 12-Zicha | 1581 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | OH |
| 12912 | Princeton 16-Blue | 1581 | 15-18 | 45% | 16 | NJ |
| 12913 | Legends Volleyball Club 14 Stringfellow (OV) | 1581 | 7-4 | 64% | 14 | PR |
| 12914 | Crystal City Pearls 14 | 1581 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | NY |
| 12915 | Mavericks 14-Elite | 1581 | 25-12 | 68% | 14 | MI |
| 12916 | Waco Lightning 14-Black | 1581 | 13-10 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 12917 | MPV 12-National green | 1581 | 28-25 | 52% | 12 | UT |
| 12918 | C2 Sports 17-Crown | 1581 | 27-19 | 59% | 17 | TN |
| 12919 | Club Cactus 13-Navy | 1581 | 21-7 | 75% | 13 | AZ |
| 12920 | Fusion 17-White | 1581 | 38-40 | 49% | 17 | PA |
| 12921 | Legends Zenith 15-30 | 1581 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | OH |
| 12922 | Fresno Heat HEAT 13-Travel robert | 1581 | 17-10 | 63% | 13 | CA |
| 12923 | The Edge 16 Maroon | 1581 | 35-28 | 56% | 16 | CO |
| 12924 | WSRVC 17-Thompson | 1581 | 7-15 | 32% | 17 | WY |
| 12925 | NW Stars 14-Black | 1581 | 11-6 | 65% | 14 | WI |
| 12926 | Illini United 12 | 1581 | 15-9 | 63% | 12 | IL |
| 12927 | Bourbon City 13-1 | 1581 | 20-10 | 67% | 13 | KY |
| 12928 | NYC Volleyball Academy 14-Noho | 1581 | 24-13 | 65% | 14 | NY |
| 12929 | Eastlake 14-Michael | 1581 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | CA |
| 12930 | Club 1 18-Skronkstrong | 1581 | 9-21 | 30% | 18 | IL |
| 12931 | Tenacity 11-1 | 1581 | 11-5 | 69% | 11 | WI |
| 12932 | Phoenix 12-Orange | 1581 | 6-5 | 55% | 12 | OH |
| 12933 | 360 15-1 | 1581 | 16-10 | 53% | 15 | NV |
| 12934 | Amarillo Xtreme 16 Ambush | 1581 | 15-15 | 50% | 16 | TX |
| 12935 | GSEVC 15-National blue | 1581 | 22-14 | 61% | 15 | NJ |
| 12936 | City Beach 16-Anna | 1581 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | CA |
| 12937 | Ta'ahine AZ Club 16 Ta'ahine AZ TAPU LULULULU | 1581 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | AZ |
| 12938 | Balboa Bay 14-Blue | 1581 | 26-20 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 12939 | RVC 14-1 | 1581 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | WY |
| 12940 | Kairos 15-Black | 1581 | 36-21 | 63% | 15 | SD |
| 12941 | Mizuno M1 17-2 | 1581 | 35-38 | 48% | 17 | MN |
| 12942 | ND Elite 18-Gold | 1581 | 7-3 | 70% | 18 | ND |
| 12943 | Texas United 14-Navy | 1581 | 27-21 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 12944 | SC Legends 16-Nike | 1581 | 29-23 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 12945 | City 16-Blue | 1581 | 24-27 | 47% | 16 | CA |
| 12946 | Playeros 14-1 andres | 1581 | 27-15 | 64% | 14 | FL |
| 12947 | CGSV 15-Piccolini | 1581 | 19-15 | 56% | 15 | OH |
| 12948 | NSSC 15-Black | 1581 | 30-15 | 63% | 15 | MO |
| 12949 | Patriots 14-S | 1581 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | MN |
| 12950 | White Hawks 12-1 | 1581 | 2-0 | 100% | 12 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.