Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 257 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
12801 WLDGT 14 Elite 1582 40-20 66% 14 MO
12802 Syndicate VC 14-2 1582 11-4 73% 14 CA
12803 Madtown 14-Red 1582 9-1 90% 14 WI
12804 Allegro 16-South black 1582 32-20 62% 16 NJ
12805 Jags 12-1 1582 7-2 78% 12 MN
12806 Bullets 17-1 1582 4-1 80% 17 OH
12807 VVA 14-Heinrichs 1582 6-2 75% 14 CA
12808 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 12-4 1582 5-2 71% 12 KS
12809 1W 16-2 elite 1582 34-34 50% 16 WI
12810 Main Beach 17-Elite 1582 24-21 53% 17 CA
12811 FDL Fusion 13-Purple 1582 11-10 52% 13 WI
12812 Rapid Fire 16-Black 1582 18-13 58% 16 IL
12813 Matrix 13 15 Melissa 1582 13-16 45% 13 AZ
12814 Bubbles United 13-Carlson 1582 16-7 70% 13 FL
12815 Cross Court 15 1582 10-6 59% 15 WI
12816 The 606 15-Prime 1582 23-28 45% 15 IL
12817 The Edge 15 Elite 1582 29-21 58% 15 IL
12818 Xtreme 16-Nat - deb 1582 10-9 53% 16 NJ
12819 OJVA 16-1 gold 1582 38-46 45% 16 OR
12820 BCO 16-Black 1582 4-3 57% 16 WA
12821 Sunset West 14-Net ninjas 1582 4-1 67% 14 NE
12822 JNVBC 15-White 1582 13-7 57% 15 IA
12823 Heat 13-Ignite 1582 11-5 65% 13 NV
12824 Top Caliber 13 Rachel 1582 17-14 55% 13 NC
12825 CVC 10-Silver 1582 8-6 57% 10 OH
12826 VVA 12-Deruiter 1582 4-1 80% 12 CA
12827 TORCH 17-Rhya 1582 30-19 61% 17 CA
12828 TIV 18-Black 1582 12-8 60% 18 TX
12829 Junior Bisons 18-Gold 1582 1-6 14% 18 KY
12830 Texas Tornados 12-Adidas 1582 24-18 57% 12 TX
12831 Rev 18-1 avengers 1582 19-21 48% 18 IN
12832 NVPUR 16-Josyhel 1582 7-3 70% 16 PR
12833 CUVB 15-Black 1582 23-16 56% 15 TX
12834 MSVC 14-Adidas geo 1582 23-16 59% 14 FL
12835 Legacy 15-Elite west 1582 29-20 59% 15 MI
12836 moxie 12 1582 9-7 56% 12 TX
12837 Dallas Premier 13-Black r 1582 4-4 50% 13 TX
12838 Croix Attack 15-1 1582 10-14 42% 15 WI
12839 LA6 17-Tina 1582 18-9 67% 17 LA
12840 716 United VBC 14 1582 8-3 73% 14 NY
12841 Absolute 18-Pink 1582 29-36 45% 18 CA
12842 Monarcas Volleyball 13-Dennis 1582 4-3 57% 13 PR
12843 Mass Pats 15-4 communication 1582 13-4 65% 15 MA
12844 Pine Volleyball 14 1582 12-9 57% 14 WY
12845 COA 14-Vipers 1582 29-29 50% 14 IN
12846 COAST 14-5 allan 1582 22-19 54% 14 CA
12847 MAVS 816 11-1 1582 4-3 57% 11 KS
12848 Mass Premier 16-2 1582 16-20 44% 16 MA
12849 Munciana 11 Yukons 1582 21-25 45% 11 IN
12850 Monarcas 12-Dennis 1582 2-4 33% 12 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.