Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 254 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
12651 Team Atlantis 17 1584 3-2 60% 17 OH
12652 PR SELECT 17-National 1584 11-10 52% 17 PR
12653 PREVAIL Girls 17-Platinum 1584 21-14 60% 17 PA
12654 Hitt 13 Jasmine 1584 6-4 60% 13 MI
12655 Abingdon Falcons 17 1584 13-8 62% 17 VA
12656 Northern Revival 18 1584 28-21 57% 18 MN
12657 TNT 14-Iron butterfly 1584 41-26 61% 14 PA
12658 702 Blessed 15 1584 4-3 57% 15 UT
12659 NWAS Kelso 14-Alpha 1584 26-21 55% 14 OR
12660 NPJ Salem 15-Premier 1584 20-34 37% 15 OR
12661 Victory 13-Nat'l green 1584 3-8 23% 13 TX
12662 Apex 18-National red 1584 12-4 71% 18 MO
12663 RCVC 18-N 1584 7-4 64% 18 TN
12664 PSVA 13-2 1584 32-29 52% 13 FL
12665 NLVA 15-Everett 1584 25-15 61% 15 MO
12666 Ark Volley 14-National 1584 53-19 74% 14 AR
12667 SGJO 16-1 1584 5-1 83% 16 MN
12668 MVC 16 McKenna 1584 29-25 54% 16 OH
12669 Synergy 15 Silicon 1584 41-19 68% 15 PA
12670 Empire 14-Power yasmim & nicole 1584 11-6 65% 14 CA
12671 BanditsX 16 Bandits- Hamby 1584 8-3 73% 16 AL
12672 Downstate 16-Red 1584 24-20 55% 16 NY
12673 Lineshot 10-Purple regional 1584 4-2 67% 10 OH
12674 HOU STARS 16-Adidas 1584 29-25 54% 16 TX
12675 Junior Bisons 17-Gold 1584 2-5 29% 17 KY
12676 IVBA 13 REN 1584 33-20 62% 13 MS
12677 Ox Imp 12-1 1584 18-13 58% 12 MI
12678 Legit 16-G suzanne 1584 6-4 60% 16 IA
12679 NOVA 12 REGIONAL 1584 21-13 60% 12 LA
12680 Stewie 17-Blue 1584 26-17 60% 17 MN
12681 14u-ThunderStrike-Palmer 14-6 1584 4-1 80% 14 MI
12682 VOLT 12-Force 1584 8-2 53% 12 ND
12683 SPVC 16-Adidas kel 1584 35-25 58% 16 CA
12684 COAST 12-2 caroline 1584 22-19 54% 12 CA
12685 T10 Jrs 15-1 1584 4-1 80% 15 NE
12686 Northern Tier 13-Blue 1584 7-5 47% 13 PA
12687 NSSC 18-Black 1584 31-12 70% 18 MO
12688 AVB Fire 18 1584 6-2 75% 18 MN
12689 Spire VC 14-Salinas 1584 18-12 60% 14 OH
12690 Wildfire 13-Taylor 1584 19-16 54% 13 FL
12691 HDVC 12-Brittany hardin 1584 7-3 70% 12 TN
12692 Bluegrass Volleyball Academy 16 BVA 65 Select Taylor 1584 14-5 74% 16 KY
12693 Ultimate G17 Gold 1584 26-24 52% 17 IL
12694 W Pride 14-1 1584 10-6 63% 14 NY
12695 ADREN 17-1 1584 11-5 69% 17 OH
12696 Spiketown Reign 18-Black 1584 8-2 80% 18 WI
12697 Mid-Michigan ACES 13-Katie 1584 9-6 60% 13 MI
12698 Prime Time 13 Prime Time (OK) (5) 1584 16-10 62% 13 OK
12699 MWVC 16-Barcelo 1584 4-1 80% 16 PR
12700 CUVC 15-National2 1584 2-8 20% 15 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.