Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 252 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
12551 Durham Rebels Volleyball Club 15 Durham Rebels Bounty 1586 6-0 100% 15 ON
12552 NKYVC 15-4 thunder 1586 21-15 58% 15 KY
12553 Pacific Coast 17-1 1586 4-3 57% 17 BC
12554 MidShore Volleyball 14 14U MidShore Makos (CH) 1585 14-6 56% 14
12555 TTC 17 Elite 1585 22-11 67% 17 FL
12556 Triangle 12-White 1585 23-16 59% 12 NC
12557 AVB Fire 15-1 red 1585 28-11 72% 15 MN
12558 Rosemount 12-3 1585 6-2 75% 12 MN
12559 STL Crossfire 14-R3 1585 26-12 68% 14 MO
12560 AsheVC 17-Crystal 1585 21-11 66% 17 NC
12561 Husky 16-New england black 1585 24-19 56% 16 CT
12562 White Hawks 12-2 1585 4-1 80% 12 MN
12563 Monon 11-2m charge 1585 14-7 67% 11 IN
12564 JAG VBC 14-1 national 1585 48-30 62% 14 WI
12565 Long Island Blaze VBC 18 1585 5-1 83% 18 NJ
12566 RAGE 12-1 1585 12-4 71% 12 WI
12567 Pit Elite 13-Premier 1585 3-2 60% 13 PA
12568 Ohana 16-National 1585 29-22 57% 16 IA
12569 AP 12-Baden 1585 30-27 53% 12 TX
12570 FTL 17-Fusion pedro 1585 10-29 26% 17 FL
12571 ATOMIC 17 Energy 1585 32-19 63% 17 AZ
12572 St. Croix Select 12 SC Select White 1585 12-3 75% 12 WI
12573 Hammerhead 15-2 1585 16-8 67% 15 MN
12574 Pulse 14-Select 1585 20-10 67% 14 MI
12575 Impact Wāhine 13-1 1585 5-2 71% 13 HI
12576 Club Velocity 11-1 1585 26-12 63% 11 AR
12577 XFactor VBC 18 1585 22-14 61% 18 NV
12578 360 Volleyball Club 17 17 Kaos Red 1585 5-2 71% 17 TX
12579 UVC 15 1585 4-2 67% 15 IL
12580 UNION 13-Ky grey 1585 30-15 67% 13 IN
12581 Blaze 13-Wildcats 1585 6-2 75% 13 IL
12582 Fearless Elite 15-1 1585 25-12 64% 15 AR
12583 RVA G13-Pink 1585 32-17 65% 13 WI
12584 Jellys 14-Black 1585 29-12 71% 14 FL
12585 SC Legends 14-White 1585 15-6 71% 14 CA
12586 Vaqueras 13-F marcos m 1585 5-1 83% 13 PR
12587 Desert Sun Volleyball 18-1 1585 7-4 64% 18 NV
12588 Hawks VBC 11-1 1585 6-4 60% 11 OH
12589 Hype VB 12-Puckett 1585 6-2 67% 12 MS
12590 Intense 17-Kev 1585 17-12 59% 17 LA
12591 Florida Conquer 18-National 1585 35-15 70% 18 FL
12592 Dinamite 15-Franc 1585 21-13 62% 15 CA
12593 SPARK 14-1 1585 13-13 50% 14 OK
12594 Fresno Heat Volleyball Club 13-Red 1585 0-0 0% 13 CA
12595 Freeze ND 13 Polar 1585 25-22 50% 13 ND
12596 PCVBC 15 Zenni 1585 16-5 76% 15 OH
12597 South Shore 16-Red south shore 16 mizuno 1585 3-4 43% 16 NV
12598 Sky High 15-1 1585 9-3 69% 15 TX
12599 CMASS EDGE 15-White 1585 24-15 62% 15 MA
12600 Coastal Bend Juniors 13 Wave 1585 13-6 65% 13 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.