2025-2026 Season — Page 252 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12551 | Durham Rebels Volleyball Club 15 Durham Rebels Bounty | 1586 | 6-0 | 100% | 15 | ON |
| 12552 | NKYVC 15-4 thunder | 1586 | 21-15 | 58% | 15 | KY |
| 12553 | Pacific Coast 17-1 | 1586 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | BC |
| 12554 | MidShore Volleyball 14 14U MidShore Makos (CH) | 1585 | 14-6 | 56% | 14 | |
| 12555 | TTC 17 Elite | 1585 | 22-11 | 67% | 17 | FL |
| 12556 | Triangle 12-White | 1585 | 23-16 | 59% | 12 | NC |
| 12557 | AVB Fire 15-1 red | 1585 | 28-11 | 72% | 15 | MN |
| 12558 | Rosemount 12-3 | 1585 | 6-2 | 75% | 12 | MN |
| 12559 | STL Crossfire 14-R3 | 1585 | 26-12 | 68% | 14 | MO |
| 12560 | AsheVC 17-Crystal | 1585 | 21-11 | 66% | 17 | NC |
| 12561 | Husky 16-New england black | 1585 | 24-19 | 56% | 16 | CT |
| 12562 | White Hawks 12-2 | 1585 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | MN |
| 12563 | Monon 11-2m charge | 1585 | 14-7 | 67% | 11 | IN |
| 12564 | JAG VBC 14-1 national | 1585 | 48-30 | 62% | 14 | WI |
| 12565 | Long Island Blaze VBC 18 | 1585 | 5-1 | 83% | 18 | NJ |
| 12566 | RAGE 12-1 | 1585 | 12-4 | 71% | 12 | WI |
| 12567 | Pit Elite 13-Premier | 1585 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | PA |
| 12568 | Ohana 16-National | 1585 | 29-22 | 57% | 16 | IA |
| 12569 | AP 12-Baden | 1585 | 30-27 | 53% | 12 | TX |
| 12570 | FTL 17-Fusion pedro | 1585 | 10-29 | 26% | 17 | FL |
| 12571 | ATOMIC 17 Energy | 1585 | 32-19 | 63% | 17 | AZ |
| 12572 | St. Croix Select 12 SC Select White | 1585 | 12-3 | 75% | 12 | WI |
| 12573 | Hammerhead 15-2 | 1585 | 16-8 | 67% | 15 | MN |
| 12574 | Pulse 14-Select | 1585 | 20-10 | 67% | 14 | MI |
| 12575 | Impact Wāhine 13-1 | 1585 | 5-2 | 71% | 13 | HI |
| 12576 | Club Velocity 11-1 | 1585 | 26-12 | 63% | 11 | AR |
| 12577 | XFactor VBC 18 | 1585 | 22-14 | 61% | 18 | NV |
| 12578 | 360 Volleyball Club 17 17 Kaos Red | 1585 | 5-2 | 71% | 17 | TX |
| 12579 | UVC 15 | 1585 | 4-2 | 67% | 15 | IL |
| 12580 | UNION 13-Ky grey | 1585 | 30-15 | 67% | 13 | IN |
| 12581 | Blaze 13-Wildcats | 1585 | 6-2 | 75% | 13 | IL |
| 12582 | Fearless Elite 15-1 | 1585 | 25-12 | 64% | 15 | AR |
| 12583 | RVA G13-Pink | 1585 | 32-17 | 65% | 13 | WI |
| 12584 | Jellys 14-Black | 1585 | 29-12 | 71% | 14 | FL |
| 12585 | SC Legends 14-White | 1585 | 15-6 | 71% | 14 | CA |
| 12586 | Vaqueras 13-F marcos m | 1585 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | PR |
| 12587 | Desert Sun Volleyball 18-1 | 1585 | 7-4 | 64% | 18 | NV |
| 12588 | Hawks VBC 11-1 | 1585 | 6-4 | 60% | 11 | OH |
| 12589 | Hype VB 12-Puckett | 1585 | 6-2 | 67% | 12 | MS |
| 12590 | Intense 17-Kev | 1585 | 17-12 | 59% | 17 | LA |
| 12591 | Florida Conquer 18-National | 1585 | 35-15 | 70% | 18 | FL |
| 12592 | Dinamite 15-Franc | 1585 | 21-13 | 62% | 15 | CA |
| 12593 | SPARK 14-1 | 1585 | 13-13 | 50% | 14 | OK |
| 12594 | Fresno Heat Volleyball Club 13-Red | 1585 | 0-0 | 0% | 13 | CA |
| 12595 | Freeze ND 13 Polar | 1585 | 25-22 | 50% | 13 | ND |
| 12596 | PCVBC 15 Zenni | 1585 | 16-5 | 76% | 15 | OH |
| 12597 | South Shore 16-Red south shore 16 mizuno | 1585 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | NV |
| 12598 | Sky High 15-1 | 1585 | 9-3 | 69% | 15 | TX |
| 12599 | CMASS EDGE 15-White | 1585 | 24-15 | 62% | 15 | MA |
| 12600 | Coastal Bend Juniors 13 Wave | 1585 | 13-6 | 65% | 13 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.