2025-2026 Season — Page 243 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12101 | CSVC 13-Blue | 1591 | 14-6 | 70% | 13 | NC |
| 12102 | SIZZl 15-1 | 1591 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | CA |
| 12103 | A5 West 14 Jason | 1591 | 34-25 | 58% | 14 | GA |
| 12104 | Red Storm 16-Nw | 1591 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | LA |
| 12105 | Vista 15-Chenowith | 1591 | 5-1 | 83% | 15 | CA |
| 12106 | NYC Juniors 16 Brooklyn | 1591 | 16-12 | 57% | 16 | NY |
| 12107 | Rockwood Thunder 11-White | 1591 | 16-11 | 55% | 11 | MO |
| 12108 | Idaho Show 16-1 | 1591 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | ID |
| 12109 | CV Starlings 14-Kayleen | 1591 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | CA |
| 12110 | Alliance 14-Freeze | 1591 | 11-7 | 55% | 14 | MA |
| 12111 | KSA 15-Red | 1591 | 32-13 | 71% | 15 | KY |
| 12112 | North Pacific Juniors - Portland 16 Durham Rebels Alliance | 1591 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | OR |
| 12113 | Criollas 14-1 | 1591 | 3-8 | 27% | 14 | PR |
| 12114 | Intense Adidas 15-Ae | 1591 | 27-21 | 56% | 15 | SC |
| 12115 | 913Athletics 16-Black | 1591 | 12-11 | 52% | 16 | KS |
| 12116 | OCVBC 11 | 1591 | 4-1 | 80% | 11 | NE |
| 12117 | White Cross Elite 16-Ray | 1591 | 19-10 | 66% | 16 | NC |
| 12118 | SF Juniors Volleyball 15-Black | 1591 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | CA |
| 12119 | Samba 15 | 1591 | 31-12 | 70% | 15 | CA |
| 12120 | Illini United 11 | 1591 | 16-7 | 70% | 11 | IL |
| 12121 | Club W 14-Red | 1591 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | WI |
| 12122 | Architects Volleyball Club 16-Black | 1591 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | TX |
| 12123 | Delaware Juniors 15-Ace | 1591 | 30-19 | 61% | 15 | PA |
| 12124 | TX IMPACT 12-1 hybrid | 1591 | 12-8 | 60% | 12 | TX |
| 12125 | COLAVOL 13-Black | 1591 | 26-8 | 76% | 13 | GA |
| 12126 | CMVBC 13-2 | 1591 | 6-2 | 75% | 13 | MO |
| 12127 | Devils Tower 18 | 1591 | 10-3 | 77% | 18 | WY |
| 12128 | Power 16-Purple | 1591 | 16-23 | 37% | 16 | TX |
| 12129 | Mountain View Volleyball Club 12 MVVC Youth G 6- Vivian | 1591 | 6-2 | 75% | 12 | CA |
| 12130 | TX Alpha Prem 11 | 1591 | 14-5 | 70% | 11 | TX |
| 12131 | 305VBC 11-R felipe | 1591 | 9-6 | 60% | 11 | FL |
| 12132 | Patriots 12 | 1591 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | MN |
| 12133 | ALJRS 16 National | 1591 | 28-19 | 60% | 16 | AL |
| 12134 | TEVA 17-8 | 1591 | 23-19 | 55% | 17 | NJ |
| 12135 | CHAMP 17-1 | 1591 | 12-6 | 67% | 17 | AL |
| 12136 | SKY Elite 15-1 | 1591 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | PA |
| 12137 | Tstreet SN 17-Tami | 1591 | 23-15 | 61% | 17 | NV |
| 12138 | Ox Imp 14-1 | 1591 | 12-4 | 75% | 14 | MI |
| 12139 | OBX WAVE 16-Black | 1591 | 16-9 | 64% | 16 | VA |
| 12140 | Apex Volleyball Club 14-2 | 1591 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | MO |
| 12141 | Artesanas 13-Jesenia | 1591 | 9-3 | 75% | 13 | PR |
| 12142 | Stormbreaker 14-Valkyrie | 1591 | 26-11 | 70% | 14 | CA |
| 12143 | NIVB 14-Green | 1591 | 24-16 | 60% | 14 | MN |
| 12144 | CVA 15-Black | 1591 | 39-33 | 54% | 15 | CO |
| 12145 | Whirlwind VBC 16-1 | 1591 | 18-16 | 51% | 16 | NY |
| 12146 | Hype 15-1 | 1591 | 31-30 | 51% | 15 | MN |
| 12147 | Reef 16-National brock/sierra | 1591 | 9-3 | 75% | 16 | CA |
| 12148 | SASVBC B 12-Briana | 1591 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | HI |
| 12149 | UNION 13-Green | 1591 | 40-33 | 54% | 13 | IN |
| 12150 | C1VB 13-Regional coral | 1591 | 19-14 | 58% | 13 | SC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.