Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1 Legacy 14-1 adidas 2630 80-6 93% 14 MI
2 TAV 16-Black yun 2592 82-9 90% 16 TX
3 A5 16-Gabe 2591 87-2 98% 16 GA
4 WAVE 15-Brennan 2559 64-6 91% 15 CA
5 Legacy 15-1 adidas 2552 81-7 92% 15 MI
6 Dal Skyline 14-Royal-erin 2533 82-5 94% 14 TX
7 A5 13-Karen 2533 78-14 85% 13 GA
8 TAV 17-Black jon 2525 71-5 93% 17 TX
9 Dal Skyline 15-Royal-ryan 2519 67-11 86% 15 TX
10 SC Rockstar LOVB 17-Angel 2497 62-12 84% 17 CA
11 Club V 17-Prodigy reed 2497 66-7 90% 17 UT
12 DYNASTY 14-Black 2481 61-10 86% 14 KS
13 MADFROG 15-N green 2479 99-26 77% 15 TX
14 AJV 15 adidas 2477 67-12 85% 15 TX
15 OT 15-T randy 2475 63-12 84% 15 FL
16 OT 17-T aaron 2466 67-11 86% 17 FL
17 Dal Skyline 16-Royal-paul 2466 54-14 79% 16 TX
18 WAVE 16-Scott 2463 54-15 78% 16 CA
19 WPVC 17-Armour black 2451 74-8 90% 17 FL
20 Circle City 16-Purple 2450 74-5 94% 16 IN
21 A5 14 Helen 2449 71-23 76% 14 GA
22 Circle City 14-Purple 2449 66-17 80% 14 IN
23 H Skyline 15 Royal 2439 59-16 79% 15 TX
24 ARIZONA STORM 15 THUNDER 2433 63-20 76% 15 AZ
25 Madfrog 13-N green 2428 51-5 89% 13 TX
26 Boiler Jrs 14-O gold 2423 78-25 76% 14 IN
27 KC Power 15-1 2422 44-11 80% 15 MO
28 Tribe 14-Vktry cardinal 2418 64-12 84% 14 FL
29 Alamo 16-Premier 2412 67-17 80% 16 TX
30 Legacy 17-1 adidas 2408 71-15 83% 17 MI
31 MN Select 16-1 2405 67-19 78% 16 MN
32 ID Crush 16 Bower 2402 71-15 83% 16 ID
33 ARIZONA STORM 17 THUNDER 2400 61-20 75% 17 AZ
34 Metro Volleyball Club 14-Travel 2400 63-16 80% 14 DC
35 Top Select 14 Elite 2397 61-22 73% 14 FL
36 Absolute 14-Black 2396 56-17 77% 14 CA
37 Circle City 15-Purple 2395 63-23 73% 15 IN
38 Elevation 14-Case 2395 47-16 75% 14 OH
39 Top Select 15 Elite 2393 70-18 80% 15 FL
40 Surfside 13-Pv elite 2392 56-14 80% 13 CA
41 NKYVC 16-1 tsunami 2390 55-23 71% 16 KY
42 AZ Sky 17 Gold 2390 64-20 76% 17 AZ
43 SC Rockstar 15-Carlos 2389 48-14 77% 15 CA
44 Boiler Jrs 15-O gold 2387 73-25 74% 15 IN
45 Adversity 16-Adidas 2385 47-23 67% 16 IL
46 ARIZONA STORM 16 THUNDER 2385 56-22 72% 16 AZ
47 H Skyline 16-Royal 2380 50-27 65% 16 TX
48 DYNASTY 16-Black 2379 54-16 77% 16 KS
49 COAST 13-1 tina 2379 60-4 94% 13 CA
50 Metro Volleyball Club 15-Travel 2376 70-11 86% 15 DC
1234Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.