Youth Club Boys Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Boys Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 boys volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Balboa Bay 16-Blue with a 2364 Elo rating and 49-7 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive boys youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for boys volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1 Balboa Bay 16-Blue 2364 49-7 88% 16 CA
2 C2 Attack 17-1 2361 76-8 90% 17 TN
3 Triangle Boys 18-Black 2335 72-9 89% 18 NC
4 MB Surf 18-Asics 2318 38-6 86% 18 CA
5 949 B18-Black 2311 36-8 82% 18 CA
6 Balboa Bay 18-Blue 2300 36-6 86% 18 CA
7 Indoor 15 2295 59-8 88% 15 CA
8 Cinci Attack 16-Black 2289 55-12 82% 16 OH
9 Balboa Bay 14-Blue 2277 53-6 90% 14 CA
10 Bay to Bay 17-1 2276 51-15 77% 17 CA
11 MB Surf 16-Asics 2272 42-11 79% 16 CA
12 Team Rockstar 18 Matt 2266 37-8 82% 18 CA
13 Team Rockstar 16 Angel 2266 46-6 88% 16 CA
14 HPSTL 17-Royal 2263 65-12 84% 17 MO
15 Pipeline 16-1 2254 60-18 77% 16 IL
16 MB Surf 14-1 asics 2253 48-10 83% 14 CA
17 COAST 16-1 dave/nick 2249 47-9 84% 16 CA
18 MVVC B 16-Red 2247 60-18 77% 16 CA
19 Warren Sixpack 16-1 2246 39-11 78% 16 NJ
20 WPVC Boys 18-Armour black 2245 58-11 84% 18 FL
21 SouthCoastVolleyball 18 2240 44-6 88% 18 PR
22 BORINQUEN COQUI 14-1m 2237 28-4 88% 14 PR
23 630 Volleyball 18-1 2236 56-19 75% 18 IL
24 Bay to Bay 16-1 2233 40-16 71% 16 CA
25 Team Rockstar 17 Jason 2230 39-6 87% 17 CA
26 SPVB B18 Elite 2226 54-16 77% 18 IL
27 MVC 18-North shore 2224 68-16 81% 18 WI
28 Aspire 17-Iron man 2222 55-10 85% 17 AZ
29 COAST 15-1 chris/ian 2219 52-13 80% 15 CA
30 COAST 18-1 pat 2217 36-8 82% 18 CA
31 MOD B14-Blue 2216 75-9 89% 14 IL
32 COAST 17-1 victor/berkeley 2213 39-6 87% 17 CA
33 Adversity VBC 16 Adidas 2210 62-25 71% 16 IL
34 MKE Sting 16-1 2209 57-23 71% 16 WI
35 MVVC B 18-Red 2209 67-10 87% 18 CA
36 C2 Attack 18-1 elite 2208 60-14 81% 18 TN
37 Adversity South 18 Adidas 2206 55-27 67% 18 IL
38 Bay to Bay 14-1 2204 44-16 73% 14 CA
39 SASVBC B 15-Maya 2198 31-8 79% 15 HI
40 Team Rockstar 14 Anjinho 2195 41-20 67% 14 CA
41 HPSTL 16-Royal 2194 47-23 67% 16 MO
42 Milwaukee Sting 18-1 2192 44-21 68% 18 WI
43 PAC 17 McKay 2191 34-9 79% 17 CA
44 SBVC Boys 17-1 2190 12-0 100% 17 CA
45 Aspire 16 Spiderman 2176 39-18 68% 16 AZ
46 Miami United 16-National matt 2173 28-13 68% 16 FL
47 Pulse 15 Isaac 2173 44-12 79% 15 CA
48 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-1m 2171 27-7 79% 16 PR
49 SASVBC B 18-Jordan 2169 27-4 87% 18 HI
50 Vanguard 18-Gold webb 2164 35-17 67% 18 OH
1234Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.