College Club Men's Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 4 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens College Club Men's Volleyball Rankings track hundreds of men's college club volleyball teams nationwide using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from NCVF tournaments, conference play, and national qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Utah Valley A with a 1879 Elo rating and 48-9 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive men's youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for men's volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
151 U Southern Cal A 1568 14-19 42% all CA
152 Tufts U 1567 10-12 45% all MA
153 Boston C 1565 14-12 54% all MA
154 Westfield St U 1564 11-4 73% all MA
155 Virginia Tech U C 1564 12-4 75% all VA
156 U Pacific A 1563 9-3 75% all CA
157 U Chicago A 1563 10-11 48% all IL
158 U Michigan A 1562 14-21 40% all MI
159 Emory A 1562 15-10 58% all GA
160 Washington St U 1561 16-14 53% all WA
161 Ricks Co B 1561 10-3 77% all ID
162 UT-Arlington A 1561 13-14 48% all TX
163 U Alabama B 1560 13-6 68% all AL
164 Ricks Co A 1559 8-7 53% all ID
165 John Carroll U 1559 12-6 67% all OH
166 Missouri U ST A 1559 15-12 56% all MO
167 Stockton U A 1559 5-2 71% all NJ
168 Florida Intl U A 1558 8-10 44% all FL
169 U Utah A 1557 8-5 62% all UT
170 Grand Valley St U 1557 10-10 50% all MI
171 West Chester A 1557 11-10 52% all PA
172 U South Florida A 1556 10-8 56% all FL
173 Florida State U 1556 8-11 42% all FL
174 Middlebury C 1556 11-8 58% all VT
175 U Central Florida A 1555 11-10 52% all FL
176 Oakland U 1554 10-6 63% all MI
177 U Arizona A 1552 17-24 41% all AZ
178 Navy A 1552 13-8 62% all MD
179 Kennesaw St U 1552 11-10 52% all GA
180 Marist C 1551 9-5 64% all NY
181 Syracuse U C 1550 6-3 67% all NY
182 Stanford U 1549 11-16 41% all CA
183 Carleton U 1547 6-6 50% all MN
184 U Buffalo A 1547 6-9 40% all NY
185 Tennessee Tech U 1546 10-6 63% all TN
186 Carleton C 1546 23-12 66% all MN
187 Elon U 1546 16-13 48% all NC
188 U Maryland B 1545 18-9 67% all MD
189 U Dayton A 1545 12-12 50% all OH
190 U Rhode Island B 1545 12-6 67% all RI
191 U Michigan B 1544 21-13 62% all MI
192 Colby College A 1544 11-6 65% all ME
193 U Delaware A 1544 6-10 38% all DE
194 U Connecticut A 1543 10-10 50% all CT
195 Penn U A 1543 8-12 40% all PA
196 U Arkansas A 1542 8-12 40% all AR
197 Rutgers-New Brnwk B 1542 12-7 63% all NJ
198 Missouri U ST B 1542 9-4 69% all MO
199 Providence (RI) A 1540 11-7 61% all RI
200 NJIT B 1540 3-0 100% all NJ
← Previous1234567Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.