College Club Men's Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 3 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens College Club Men's Volleyball Rankings track hundreds of men's college club volleyball teams nationwide using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from NCVF tournaments, conference play, and national qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Utah Valley A with a 1817 Elo rating and 61-9 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive men's youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for men's volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
101 TexasAM-Corpus Christi A 1583 11-3 79% all TX
102 U Tampa A 1583 11-5 69% all FL
103 Virginia Tech U C 1582 12-4 75% all VA
104 Michigan St B 1582 19-13 59% all MI
105 U Colorado A 1581 22-17 56% all CO
106 North Carolina St U 1580 16-10 62% all NC
107 Syracuse U A 1580 13-7 65% all NY
108 UM-Duluth A 1579 23-12 66% all MN
109 U Southern Maine A 1579 18-8 69% all ME
110 U Illinois C 1578 17-11 61% all IL
111 Rutgers-New Brnwk B 1578 12-7 63% all NJ
112 UC Santa Cruz A 1577 9-4 69% all CA
113 Purdue B 1577 16-8 67% all IN
114 Santa Clara U 1577 19-13 59% all CA
115 Iowa St B 1577 17-8 68% all IA
116 UW-Stout A 1575 20-10 67% all WI
117 Ricks Co B 1573 10-3 77% all ID
118 Georgia State U 1573 17-7 68% all GA
119 Montana St U 1571 18-11 62% all MT
120 Bryant U 1571 17-9 65% all RI
121 U Rhode Island B 1571 12-6 67% all RI
122 Wake Forest U 1569 13-6 68% all NC
123 Westfield St U 1568 11-4 73% all MA
124 Louisiana St U B 1568 14-11 56% all LA
125 Colorado St U 1568 15-7 68% all CO
126 UC-Riverside A 1564 36-24 60% all CA
127 UW-Milwaukee A 1564 14-7 67% all WI
128 Missouri U ST B 1564 9-4 69% all MO
129 U Pacific A 1564 9-3 75% all CA
130 Emory A 1563 15-10 58% all GA
131 U Victoria A 1562 9-5 64% all BC
132 St Louis U A 1561 16-11 59% all MO
133 Va Commonwealth U A 1561 12-10 55% all VA
134 Navy A 1560 13-8 62% all MD
135 U Oregon B 1559 23-14 62% all OR
136 Syracuse U C 1559 6-3 67% all NY
137 U Alabama A 1558 15-9 63% all AL
138 Liberty U B 1558 11-9 55% all VA
139 Missouri U ST A 1557 15-12 56% all MO
140 Ricks Co A 1557 8-7 53% all ID
141 Stockton U A 1556 5-2 71% all NJ
142 Middlebury C 1555 11-8 58% all VT
143 U Minnesota A 1555 10-12 45% all MN
144 Marist C 1554 9-5 64% all NY
145 John Carroll U 1554 12-6 67% all OH
146 U Nebraska A 1554 13-6 68% all NE
147 UW-Whitewater B 1553 12-7 63% all WI
148 Wash U-STL B 1553 8-3 73% all MO
149 Texas Tech U B 1551 14-8 64% all TX
150 Boise St U B 1548 5-1 83% all ID
← Previous123456Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.