NJCAA Women's Volleyball Power Rankings

2026-2027 Season — Page 6 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens NJCAA Women's Volleyball Power Rankings cover every NJCAA women's volleyball program across Divisions I, II, and III using ELO ratings updated after every match. The current #1 ranked team is Kirkwood Community College with a 1896 Elo rating and 34-0 record. Rankings reflect the 2026-2027 season.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
NJCAA Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive NJCAA women's volleyball power rankings using an advanced ELO rating system. Track every junior college program — ratings, win percentages, and match statistics.
NJCAA Volleyball ELO Ratings
Live NJCAA women's volleyball ELO ratings and standings updated after every match. Compare junior college team strength head-to-head across DI, DII, and DIII.
JUCO Volleyball Analytics
Advanced JUCO women's volleyball analytics including ELO ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The definitive resource for NJCAA women's volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
251 College of Lake County 1368 10-19 34% all IL
252 Pasco-Hernando State College 1368 6-20 23% all FL
253 Dallas College - Mountain View 1367 3-9 25% all TX
254 Carroll Community College 1366 5-10 33% all MD
255 Eastern Wyoming College 1366 9-21 30% all WY
256 Rockingham Community College 1365 2-9 18% all NC
257 Hill College 1362 9-16 36% all TX
258 Southwestern Illinois 1362 9-20 31% all IL
259 Western Technical College 1361 5-15 25% all WI
260 Elgin Community College 1360 10-19 34% all IL
261 Rose State College 1359 3-10 23% all OK
262 Montgomery County Community College 1356 1-9 10% all PA
263 Marshalltown Community College 1355 6-13 32% all IA
264 Jamestown Community College 1353 5-14 26% all NY
265 Phoenix College 1352 2-10 17% all AZ
266 University of Wisconsin-Whitewater at Rock County 1352 3-10 23% all WI
267 Coastal Alabama Community College - South 1349 8-14 36% all AL
268 SUNY Broome Community College 1348 5-16 24% all NY
269 Passaic County Community College 1346 3-9 25% all NJ
270 Mohawk Valley Community College 1345 6-13 32% all NY
271 Roxbury Community College 1337 5-11 31% all MA
272 Central Wyoming College 1336 7-21 25% all WY
273 Delaware County Community College 1335 1-9 10% all PA
274 MassBay Community College 1331 3-11 21% all MA
275 Wake Technical Community College 1330 7-17 29% all NC
276 Hostos Community College 1330 4-13 24% all NY
277 Patrick & Henry Community College 1327 1-10 9% all VA
278 Ellsworth Community College 1324 5-26 16% all IA
279 Iowa Lakes Community College 1318 6-18 25% all IA
280 Frontier Community College 1318 5-16 24% all IL
281 Lake Michigan College 1317 9-22 29% all MI
282 Chesapeake College 1311 5-14 26% all MD
283 Alpena Community College 1311 5-12 29% all MI
284 Temple College 1309 7-19 27% all TX
285 North Central Michigan College 1308 6-17 26% all MI
286 Glen Oaks Community College 1307 6-12 33% all MI
287 Lawson State Community College 1306 2-17 11% all AL
288 Fort Scott Community College 1300 4-21 16% all KS
289 Dallas College - Cedar Valley 1298 1-11 8% all TX
290 State College of Florida-Manatee-Sarasota 1298 3-19 14% all FL
291 Dakota County Technical College 1297 0-5 0% all MN
292 Joliet Junior College 1293 1-9 10% all IL
293 Kirtland Community College 1293 4-13 24% all MI
294 Harford Community College 1291 4-16 20% all MD
295 Lamar Community College 1288 6-15 29% all CO
296 South Florida State College 1288 2-19 10% all FL
297 Garden City Community College 1285 5-21 19% all KS
298 South Suburban College 1285 5-17 23% all IL
299 St. Louis Community College 1280 5-21 19% all MO
300 Jackson College 1279 2-10 17% all MI
← Previous123456789Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

NJCAA matches are best-of-five sets, and we don’t treat every win the same. A blended result quality score combines set count (sweeps weigh more than four-set wins, and four-set wins weigh more than five-set wins), per-set point margin (averaged across the match so a long five-set thriller isn’t conflated with a one-sided blowout), and the binary match outcome. The set count carries the most weight, since reaching three set wins in a best-of-five already encodes meaningful confidence in the result.

Division Strength (DI / DII / DIII)

NJCAA women’s volleyball is split into three competition levels — Division I, Division II, and Division III — each with its own pool of programs and its own national tournament. Higher-division matches carry more weight than lower-division matches at the same score, and upsets across divisions (for example a Division III program beating a Division I team) produce a bigger rating swing than the same result inside the lower division. Expected results — a Division I team beating a Division III team — move ratings less, since they confirm what the model already believed. Each division is ranked against its own peers, but the division a match is played in still shapes how much the result changes each team’s rating.

Postseason Weighting

The NJCAA national tournament is where the season is decided. Matches inside the championship window count for more than regular-season matches at the same level of competition — a win during the national bracket lifts a team’s rating more than the same win earlier in the season, and a loss in the bracket gives back more rating than a midseason loss. Each NJCAA division has its own championship window, so the boost only applies within the right bracket.

Short-Season Calibration

An NJCAA team typically plays a shorter season than a youth club, so the rating system has to learn each team’s true level quickly. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so a strong newcomer climbs to their real level fast and a struggling team isn’t unfairly anchored by a single rough weekend early on. Once a team has played enough matches, updates settle into the standard cadence.

NJCAA-Only Competition Pool

NJCAA rankings are calculated against the NJCAA program pool only. Matches against non-NJCAA opponents — visiting club teams, university JV squads, scrimmages outside the NJCAA umbrella — are excluded from the rating update and the ranked record. Outside matches still appear in the team’s match history but don’t move the ranking, which keeps ratings comparable across the league rather than reflecting whichever mix of outside opponents a team happened to schedule.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all participations and box scores, and aggregates all NJCAA matches for win/loss totals. Filters keep gender and NJCAA division consistent within each leaderboard.