NJCAA Women's Volleyball Power Rankings

2026-2027 Season — Page 5 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens NJCAA Women's Volleyball Power Rankings cover every NJCAA women's volleyball program across Divisions I, II, and III using ELO ratings updated after every match. The current #1 ranked team is Kirkwood Community College with a 1896 Elo rating and 34-0 record. Rankings reflect the 2026-2027 season.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
NJCAA Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive NJCAA women's volleyball power rankings using an advanced ELO rating system. Track every junior college program — ratings, win percentages, and match statistics.
NJCAA Volleyball ELO Ratings
Live NJCAA women's volleyball ELO ratings and standings updated after every match. Compare junior college team strength head-to-head across DI, DII, and DIII.
JUCO Volleyball Analytics
Advanced JUCO women's volleyball analytics including ELO ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The definitive resource for NJCAA women's volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
201 Union College of Union County, New Jersey 1438 6-9 40% all NJ
202 College of Southern Nevada 1438 9-7 56% all NV
203 Terra State Community College 1433 4-6 40% all OH
204 Lenoir Community College 1432 9-11 45% all NC
205 Milwaukee Area Technical College 1432 11-15 42% all WI
206 Ridgewater College 1432 6-14 30% all MN
207 Kankakee Community College 1431 14-20 41% all IL
208 Delta College 1430 1-4 20% all MI
209 Northeast Mississippi Community College 1430 10-19 34% all MS
210 Atlantic Cape Community College 1428 6-9 40% all NJ
211 Marian University Plymouth 1425 10-17 37% all IN
212 Central Arizona College 1423 4-13 24% all AZ
213 Southwestern Community College (IA) 1421 11-17 39% all IA
214 McHenry County College 1421 13-20 39% all IL
215 Macomb Community College 1421 7-14 33% all MI
216 Virginia Peninsula Community College 1420 3-8 27% all VA
217 Riverland Community College 1418 9-11 45% all MN
218 Rowan College of South Jersey-Gloucester 1417 5-7 42% all NJ
219 Southeastern Community College - Iowa 1414 10-16 38% all IA
220 Montcalm Community College 1413 6-10 38% all MI
221 Lincoln Land Community College 1412 11-25 31% all IL
222 East Central Community College 1412 6-14 30% all MS
223 Allen Community College 1411 8-16 33% all KS
224 Gillette College 1411 9-12 43% all WY
225 Seward County Community College 1404 14-17 45% all KS
226 North Platte Community College 1401 12-14 46% all NE
227 Lee College 1399 9-19 32% all TX
228 Allegany College of Maryland 1399 8-9 47% all MD
229 Florida State College at Jacksonville 1396 10-16 38% all FL
230 John Wood Community College 1395 11-12 48% all IL
231 Carl Sandburg College 1393 11-23 32% all IL
232 Butler Community College-KS 1392 10-18 36% all KS
233 Highland Community College - Illinois 1389 13-25 34% all IL
234 McCook Community College 1388 16-16 50% all CO
235 SUNY Corning Community College 1388 8-13 38% all NY
236 Johnston Community College 1388 0-4 0% all NC
237 Penn Highlands Community College 1387 5-12 29% all PA
238 Triton College 1385 9-12 43% all IL
239 Middlesex College 1385 3-9 25% all NJ
240 Rend Lake College 1384 5-9 36% all IL
241 Hocking College 1383 0-4 0% all OH
242 Dallas College - Richland 1380 3-9 25% all TX
243 Northwest College 1377 11-11 50% all WY
244 Coastal Alabama Community College - North 1377 4-13 24% all AL
245 Cloud County Community College 1373 9-14 39% all KS
246 Queensborough Community College 1372 7-11 39% all NY
247 Anne Arundel Community College 1372 3-11 21% all MD
248 USC Lancaster 1371 3-9 25% all SC
249 Southeastern Illinois College 1370 6-12 33% all IL
250 Wilbur Wright College 1370 1-4 20% all IL
← Previous12345678Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

NJCAA matches are best-of-five sets, and we don’t treat every win the same. A blended result quality score combines set count (sweeps weigh more than four-set wins, and four-set wins weigh more than five-set wins), per-set point margin (averaged across the match so a long five-set thriller isn’t conflated with a one-sided blowout), and the binary match outcome. The set count carries the most weight, since reaching three set wins in a best-of-five already encodes meaningful confidence in the result.

Division Strength (DI / DII / DIII)

NJCAA women’s volleyball is split into three competition levels — Division I, Division II, and Division III — each with its own pool of programs and its own national tournament. Higher-division matches carry more weight than lower-division matches at the same score, and upsets across divisions (for example a Division III program beating a Division I team) produce a bigger rating swing than the same result inside the lower division. Expected results — a Division I team beating a Division III team — move ratings less, since they confirm what the model already believed. Each division is ranked against its own peers, but the division a match is played in still shapes how much the result changes each team’s rating.

Postseason Weighting

The NJCAA national tournament is where the season is decided. Matches inside the championship window count for more than regular-season matches at the same level of competition — a win during the national bracket lifts a team’s rating more than the same win earlier in the season, and a loss in the bracket gives back more rating than a midseason loss. Each NJCAA division has its own championship window, so the boost only applies within the right bracket.

Short-Season Calibration

An NJCAA team typically plays a shorter season than a youth club, so the rating system has to learn each team’s true level quickly. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so a strong newcomer climbs to their real level fast and a struggling team isn’t unfairly anchored by a single rough weekend early on. Once a team has played enough matches, updates settle into the standard cadence.

NJCAA-Only Competition Pool

NJCAA rankings are calculated against the NJCAA program pool only. Matches against non-NJCAA opponents — visiting club teams, university JV squads, scrimmages outside the NJCAA umbrella — are excluded from the rating update and the ranked record. Outside matches still appear in the team’s match history but don’t move the ranking, which keeps ratings comparable across the league rather than reflecting whichever mix of outside opponents a team happened to schedule.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all participations and box scores, and aggregates all NJCAA matches for win/loss totals. Filters keep gender and NJCAA division consistent within each leaderboard.