College Club Women's Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 5 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens College Club Women's Volleyball Rankings track hundreds of women's college club volleyball teams nationwide using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from NCVF tournaments, conference play, and national qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is San Diego St U A with a 1965 Elo rating and 43-4 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive women's youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for women's volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
201 Fordham U 1527 7-6 54% all NY
202 Columbia U 1526 5-5 50% all
203 Appalachian St U B 1526 17-12 59% all NC
204 UW-Madison B 1526 15-10 60% all WI
205 UC Santa Cruz A 1526 18-18 50% all CA
206 Fairfield U 1525 6-4 60% all
207 U Nevada-Reno A 1525 15-23 39% all NV
208 U Kansas B 1525 14-8 64% all KS
209 U Maryland B 1524 11-6 65% all MD
210 U North Florida A 1524 7-8 41% all FL
211 U Victoria B 1524 11-6 65% all BC
212 Tarleton St U 1523 12-12 50% all TX
213 U Colorado B 1523 13-15 46% all CO
214 UW-Green Bay A 1522 13-9 59% all WI
215 UW-Oshkosh A 1521 11-9 52% all WI
216 Samford U 1520 2-1 67% all AL
217 Coastal Carolina U 1519 2-1 67% all SC
218 Utah State U B 1518 10-8 56% all UT
219 Missouri State U B 1518 9-6 60% all MO
220 U South Dakota A 1518 9-7 56% all SD
221 Purdue U Indy A 1517 2-1 50% all
222 U Colorado-Denver A 1516 8-9 47% all CO
223 DePaul U 1516 7-10 41% all IL
224 Youngstown St U 1516 5-7 42% all
225 U Miami B 1515 3-2 60% all FL
226 Texas Tech U B 1515 9-4 69% all TX
227 TexasAM-Corpus Christi A 1514 9-8 53% all TX
228 UW-Milwaukee A 1512 12-12 50% all WI
229 U South Florida B 1512 2-1 50% all FL
230 Duke U B 1512 3-2 60% all NC
231 U Northern Iowa B 1512 7-6 54% all IA
232 Montclair St U 1511 10-14 42% all NJ
233 Elon U A 1510 12-11 52% all NC
234 Ball State U 1509 8-12 36% all IN
235 UT-Dallas A 1508 6-6 50% all TX
236 Lehigh U 1507 5-4 56% all PA
237 Florida Atlantic U B 1506 12-9 55% all FL
238 Western Oregon U 1505 3-3 50% all OR
239 C Holy Cross A 1505 5-5 50% all MA
240 Case Western Reserve U 1504 8-10 44% all OH
241 U North Carolina-Charlotte A 1504 7-8 47% all NC
242 Emory A 1504 8-9 42% all GA
243 LaFayette C 1503 6-5 55% all PA
244 E Michigan U 1502 1-1 50% all
245 Worcester Poly Inst A 1502 6-7 46% all MA
246 Utah Tech U A 1502 9-12 43% all UT
247 Ithaca C 1500 4-4 50% all NY
248 Loyola U Maryland B 1499 1-1 33% all
249 U Richmond A 1499 3-3 50% all VA
250 Auburn U B 1499 8-7 53% all AL
← Previous12345678Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.