College Club Women's Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 3 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens College Club Women's Volleyball Rankings track hundreds of women's college club volleyball teams nationwide using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from NCVF tournaments, conference play, and national qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is San Diego St U A with a 1965 Elo rating and 43-4 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive women's youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for women's volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
101 Ricks Co A 1606 12-7 63% all ID
102 Wash U-STL A 1606 16-9 64% all MO
103 U Alabama A 1604 13-12 52% all AL
104 U Utah A 1604 13-8 62% all UT
105 Northwestern A 1604 7-2 78% all IL
106 Baylor U A 1602 15-14 52% all TX
107 U Rhode Island A 1600 17-10 63% all RI
108 Colorado Mesa U 1598 13-7 65% all CO
109 Bowling Green St A 1598 6-2 75% all
110 UNC-Wilmington A 1597 9-5 64% all NC
111 U Colorado A 1597 10-13 43% all CO
112 U Dayton B 1597 15-7 68% all OH
113 UW-LaCrosse B 1595 18-6 75% all WI
114 U Miami A 1594 11-6 65% all FL
115 Wright State U 1594 11-5 69% all OH
116 U Illinois A 1594 14-9 61% all IL
117 Saginaw Valley St U 1592 18-8 69% all MI
118 Texas Tech U A 1592 12-11 52% all TX
119 U North Carolina-Chapel Hill C 1591 16-7 70% all NC
120 MaryvilleU-SL A 1591 12-3 80% all MO
121 U Akron A 1591 13-6 68% all
122 UW-Whitewater A 1588 17-6 74% all WI
123 Providence (RI) A 1588 10-5 67% all RI
124 West Chester U 1588 11-8 58% all PA
125 Stanford A 1587 18-16 53% all CA
126 Florida State U 1586 10-11 48% all FL
127 S IllinoisEd A 1586 19-13 59% all IL
128 SUNY-Stony Brook A 1583 12-7 63% all NY
129 U Iowa A 1582 16-14 53% all IA
130 Winona St U 1582 14-9 61% all MN
131 Temple U A 1581 13-11 54% all PA
132 Cal Poly Pomona A 1581 21-23 48% all CA
133 U Connecticut B 1580 20-7 74% all CT
134 U Michigan A 1579 7-5 58% all MI
135 Cornell U A 1579 18-9 67% all NY
136 U South Carolina A 1576 11-15 42% all SC
137 Illinois St A 1574 12-9 57% all IL
138 Santa Clara U 1572 16-15 52% all CA
139 U N Colorado A 1571 13-5 72% all CO
140 Michigan Tech U 1571 11-6 65% all MI
141 Missouri State U 1570 12-12 50% all MO
142 U Arkansas B 1570 10-3 77% all AR
143 Xavier U 1568 14-8 64% all OH
144 UC-Riverside A 1568 25-27 48% all CA
145 SUNY-Geneseo A 1568 9-4 69% all NY
146 U Texas B 1567 19-12 61% all TX
147 Grand Canyon U A 1566 7-11 39% all AZ
148 Texas Christian U B 1563 10-3 77% all TX
149 CSU-Sacramento A 1559 18-17 51% all CA
150 Ohio St U C 1558 17-10 63% all OH
← Previous123456Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.