Youth Girls State Volleyball Rankings
2025-2026 Season — Page 3 · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score
Rankings last updated:
| # | State | Score | Clubs | Teams | Elite Clubs | Top Club |
| 51 |
Rhode Island |
29.63 |
8 |
72 |
2 |
ENVY |
| 52 |
Maine |
26.79 |
6 |
46 |
1 |
Maine Juniors Volleyball Club, Inc. |
| 53 |
MX |
21.63 |
4 |
17 |
|
Stars Tijuana |
| 54 |
Vermont |
18.23 |
3 |
22 |
|
Vibe VC |
| 55 |
BC |
16.82 |
6 |
14 |
|
BC Youth Volleyball |
| 56 |
AB |
16.6 |
18 |
32 |
|
North Western Volleyball Club |
| 57 |
SK |
14.5 |
5 |
9 |
|
Huskie Volleyball Club |
| 58 |
NB |
12.17 |
1 |
2 |
|
Spartans (NB) |
State Ranking Methodology
State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)
SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.
Components
- Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
- Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
- Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
- Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
- Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.