Youth Girls State Volleyball Rankings
2025-2026 Season — Page 3 · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score
Rankings last updated:
| # | State | Score | Clubs | Teams | Elite Clubs | Top Club |
| 51 |
New Mexico |
49.21 |
17 |
163 |
2 |
ARVC |
| 52 |
West Virginia |
46.94 |
11 |
50 |
2 |
PSVBC |
| 53 |
Wyoming |
30.71 |
8 |
29 |
|
Cloud Peak |
| 54 |
Maine |
30.56 |
3 |
41 |
|
Maine Jrs |
| 55 |
VIC |
28.95 |
1 |
15 |
|
KVA |
| 56 |
SK |
27.57 |
1 |
3 |
|
Sundogs |
| 57 |
NB |
18.03 |
1 |
2 |
|
Spartans (NB) |
State Ranking Methodology
State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)
SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.
Components
- Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
- Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
- Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
- Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
- Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.