Youth Girls State Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 2 · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score

Rankings last updated:

#StateScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
26 Massachusetts 65.13 36 636 8 Smash
27 Utah 64.93 28 366 7 Club V
28 Michigan 64.75 48 720 8 Legacy Volleyball Club (33380)
29 South Dakota 64.73 10 150 5 Kairos
30 Kentucky 64.21 29 396 7 NKYVC
31 New Jersey 64.12 36 490 8 Sideout
32 Maryland 62.32 39 386 8 MVSA
33 Connecticut 61.94 17 172 5 Northeast
34 Louisiana 61.52 38 336 7 WD Nation
35 Hawaii 61.01 34 242 6 SASVBC
36 Nevada 60.71 25 281 6 Vegas Aces
37 Delaware 59.4 6 45 3 Delaware United
38 Idaho 58.86 20 245 4 ID Crush
39 North Dakota 55.88 12 134 4 VOLT
40 Oklahoma 55.64 22 270 3 OK Charge
41 ON 55.61 12 74 3 HRVC Hurricanes
42 PR 55.02 16 168 3 BORINQUEN COQUI
43 District of Columbia 54.44 1 57 1 Metro
44 Montana 53.5 7 96 2 Big Sky
45 Rhode Island 52.44 5 129 2 South County
46 New Hampshire 50.76 8 137 2 D.I.G
47 Alaska 50.13 7 93 2 MSVB
48 AB 50.02 8 105 2 Aspire
49 Mississippi 49.58 13 109 2 MemphisVBAcademy
50 New Mexico 48.26 17 177 2 ARVC
← Previous12345Next →

State Ranking Methodology

State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)

SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.