Youth Girls State Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 2 · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score

Rankings last updated:

#StateScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
26 South Dakota 67.38 10 158 7 Kairos
27 Hawaii 67.2 47 327 12 SASVBC
28 New Jersey 67.18 41 498 12 Sideout
29 Minnesota 66.8 103 1095 11 Northern Lights
30 PR 66.72 82 566 14 Vaqueras
32 Oregon 64.57 94 574 12 NPJ Salem
31 Louisiana 64.57 63 458 12 WD Nation
33 Massachusetts 64.25 39 647 8 Smash
34 Nevada 64.14 34 281 9 Vegas Aces
35 Idaho 63.87 22 247 7 ID Crush
36 Maryland 63.8 43 415 10 MVSA
37 Kentucky 63.39 66 544 10 NKYVC
38 Montana 62.97 8 103 4 Big Sky
39 Connecticut 61.52 15 146 5 Northeast
40 North Dakota 58.95 14 151 5 Capital Volleyball Club
41 Delaware 58.2 7 54 3 Brandywine Volleyball Club
42 Oklahoma 56.49 47 357 5 OK Charge
43 ON 55.78 12 73 3 HRVC Hurricanes
44 New Hampshire 54.48 8 97 3 603 United
45 District of Columbia 53.96 1 58 1 Metro
46 Rhode Island 53.42 5 129 2 South County
47 BC 51.63 6 53 2 PCVC
48 Alaska 51.51 12 125 3 MSVB
49 Mississippi 51.47 13 112 2 MemphisVBAcademy
50 AB 49.27 7 87 2 Aspire
← Previous12345Next →

State Ranking Methodology

State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)

SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.