Youth Girls State Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 2 · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score

#StateScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
26 Arkansas 66.97 32 382 10 Ozark Juniors
27 Michigan 66.53 48 680 9 Legacy Volleyball Club (33380)
28 Utah 66.45 28 338 8 Club V
29 Kentucky 66.32 29 383 8 NKYVC
30 Oregon 65.01 54 463 9 NPJ Salem
31 Maryland 64.54 39 364 8 MVSA
32 Louisiana 63.51 38 318 7 WD Nation
33 Connecticut 62.47 17 169 5 Northeast
34 Delaware 60.8 6 45 3 Premier EDGE
35 Oklahoma 59.36 22 252 4 OK Charge
36 Nevada 58.68 25 241 5 Tstreet
37 Hawaii 58.03 34 231 4 SASVBC
38 Idaho 57.34 20 225 3 ID Crush
39 PR 55.8 16 161 3 BORINQUEN COQUI
40 District of Columbia 55.16 1 56 1 Metro
41 Rhode Island 54.65 5 127 2 South County
42 South Dakota 53.44 10 127 2 Kairos
43 Montana 53.09 7 95 2 Big Sky
44 New Hampshire 52.41 8 110 2 603 United
45 Alaska 51.94 7 94 2 MSVB
46 Mississippi 51.68 13 109 2 MemphisVBAcademy
47 North Dakota 50.99 12 133 2 Sanford Fargo
48 BC 50.3 6 45 2 PCVC
49 New Mexico 49.83 17 153 2 ARVC
50 ON 49.4 12 64 2 SCBandits
← Previous12345Next →

State Ranking Methodology

State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)

SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.