Youth Girls State Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score

#StateScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
1 California 87.46 307 3867 86 Vision Volleyball Club
2 Texas 87.12 282 3243 82 Texas Advantage
3 Florida 85.24 185 2588 57 Top Select
4 Ohio 80.95 101 1430 35 Elevation (3120)
5 Illinois 77.97 108 1645 27 1st Alliance
6 Missouri 77.16 98 1330 25 MAVS
7 Indiana 76.73 61 838 21 Circle City
8 Wisconsin 76.66 111 1136 27 MKE Sting
9 Pennsylvania 75.79 73 784 21 Yorktowne VB
10 Virginia 74.61 83 865 20 Paramount VBC
11 New York 74.41 92 968 21 NYC Juniors
12 North Carolina 73.75 75 860 18 Triangle
13 Arizona 72.32 83 889 19 ARIZONA STORM
14 Kansas 71.8 42 656 12 Adidas Team Dynasty
15 Georgia 71.78 55 887 14 A5
16 Alabama 71.65 43 453 14 LAV
17 Washington 71.29 70 725 14 CPA
18 Tennessee 71.04 50 690 13 Alliance Volleyball Club
19 Iowa 69.87 60 688 13 Iowa Rockets
20 Nebraska 69.5 15 275 7 Premier Nebraska
21 Colorado 69.3 81 847 13 CoJrs
22 South Carolina 68.37 44 414 10 Stars Carolinas
23 Minnesota 67.75 95 1012 10 MN Select
24 New Jersey 67.47 36 488 9 Sideout
25 Massachusetts 67.25 36 616 9 Lockdown VBC
1234Next →

State Ranking Methodology

State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)

SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.