Youth Club Girls Volleyball Tournament Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 80 · Ranked by Tournament Competitiveness Index (TCI)

Rankings last updated:

#TournamentTCITeamsMatchesAvg EloLocation
1976 1W Bash #5 (G14 FULL, G16) 31.05 22 47 1472 De Pere, WI
1977 Landon's Light • Sunday 31.04 32 68 1438 West Fargo, ND
1978 2026 PAO STL U16 & U17/U18 AAU OZ Super Regionals 31.03 26 71 1394 St. Charles, MO
1979 GEVA ATH Ocean Shore Classic 16 Club ***FULL*** 31.02 8 18 1456 Toms River, NJ
1981 NeRVE Faceoff (12s-14s) 31.01 24 40 1475 Roanoke, VA
1980 SAE #5 Serve Chilled 16s 17s 18s 31.01 29 46 1373 San Antonio, TX
1982 Project Spikers 2 - 14s Sat / 18s Sun 31 23 60 1444 Worden, MT
1984 FVBC 17 Mixed (Feb 07, P1) 31 12 27 1513 Frederick, MD
1983 Vienna Elite 13 Mixed (Feb 28, P1) 31 8 18 1458 Chantilly, VA
1985 Pre-National Scrimmage - 6/6 30.99 10 20 1422 Bensenville, IL
1986 Spike Madness U16 & U18 30.98 22 50 1473 Chattaroy, WA
1987 Chi City Showdown Championship 30.97 30 76 1436 Wood Dale, IL
1988 Academy Kick-Off Classic (12-16's) 30.96 40 79 1450 Indianapolis, IN
1990 U14 Spokane Smackdown 30.92 20 47 1475 Chatteroy, Wa
1989 2026 WCVBA Bay Area Girls Juniors League #2 30.92 34 67 1517 Livermore, CA
1991 GEVA ATH Princeton/Centercourt Classic VIII 16C Full 30.91 8 18 1495 Lawrence Township, NJ
1992 Peach State Tour 2026 - Stop1 30.89 50 96 1330 Roswell, GA
1994 1733 Challenge- Mar 29 (15's-18's) 30.88 15 29 1516 Kearney, NE
1993 Spike Sport Classic # 5 30.88 11 20 1459 Missouri City, TX
1995 Game of Heart U12 30.88 23 53 1465 Rathdrum, ID
1996 11/12u Houston Force #14 30.87 12 21 1485 Katy, TX
1997 #1 MiElite 1 Day AAU Tournaments 12u-18u 30.83 54 113 1407 Pontiac, MI
1998 Superior Volley #2 30.8 20 33 1434 San Antonio, TX
1999 2026 HOA Route 66 30.79 95 0 1451 Springfield/Mt. Vernon, MO
2000 GEVA Girls 16 Club 2 30.78 38 73 1413 Various, NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Tournament Competitiveness Index (TCI) Methodology

The TCI score measures overall tournament quality on a 0-100 scale, combining team strength, competitive balance, and prestige factors.

Score Components

  • Average Team Elo: Mean Elo rating of all participating teams. Higher average means stronger field.
  • Competitive Balance: How evenly matched the teams are. Tournaments where many teams can compete for the title score higher.
  • Prestige Score: Based on the number and quality of elite teams (1700+ Elo) in the tournament field.
  • Team Count: Larger tournaments with more teams demonstrate broader competitive appeal.
  • Match Count: More matches provide more data points for reliable ratings.