Youth Club Girls Volleyball Tournament Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 79 · Ranked by Tournament Competitiveness Index (TCI)

#TournamentTCITeamsMatchesAvg EloLocation
1951 Evolution 24.26 11 24 1497 IA
1952 Vienna Elite 12 Mixed (Jan 31, P1) 24.26 4 9 1522 Rockville, MD
1953 GEVA ATH CALI 14s New #1 24.26 12 23 1473 Hempstead, NY
1954 Academy Winter #6 24.26 17 30 1504 Katy
1955 AVMPS 16-18U Premier/Club @ Team Indiana 24.25 8 18 1485 Indianapolis, IN
1956 Centennial State Series #6 24.25 16 28 1490 CO
1957 2026 WCVBA Sac Girls Juniors League #3 24.24 15 30 1511 Rancho Cordova, CA
1958 Cougar Challenge IV 24.2 12 27 1493 Morris, MN
1959 2026 LAKE NONA SPIKES WITH LOVE 24.19 24 36 1444 Orlando, FL
1960 26 HVA Spring Development Tourney #1 24.19 10 20 1484 Houston, TX
1961 Rockstars Only - Rhythm - SRVA 24.17 15 33 1457 Murfreesboro, TN
1962 B.E.lieve U14- Brooke Ellefsen Memorial 24.15 12 28 1504 Spokane, Wa
1963 Star Sports Series #7 24.14 13 24 1448 Katy, TX
1964 Sacandaga's Scotia Snow Squall (14u&18u) 24.14 10 22 1476 Scotia, NY
1965 DBQ Insanity 24.13 13 27 1500 IA
1966 GEVA ATH Downstate 15 Club #1 (FULL) 24.13 12 23 1453 Peekskill, NY
1967 1W Bash #15 (G16) 24.12 11 24 1495 De Pere, WI
1968 MVSA 12 Mixed (Feb 21, P1) 24.11 8 18 1532 Gaithersburg, MD
1969 GEVA ath Bayside 13 Club #2 24.1 8 17 1523 Flushing, NY
1970 MVSA 13 Mixed (Mar 07, P1) 24.08 8 18 1497 Gaithersburg, MD
1971 Challenge Elite #1 24.06 14 33 1422 Friendswood, TX
1972 '26 ETC March Madness I 24.05 14 25 1449 Crown Point, IN
1973 Vienna Elite 13 Mixed (Feb 08, P1) 24.04 11 23 1448 Rockville, MD
1974 GEVA ATH Sportime AMG 14s, 03/21/2026 24.04 8 17 1489 Amagansett, NY
1976 Southern Utah Mojo Girls 17/18u Volleyball Tournament #3 24.03 5 14 1557 St. George, UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Tournament Competitiveness Index (TCI) Methodology

The TCI score measures overall tournament quality on a 0-100 scale, combining team strength, competitive balance, and prestige factors.

Score Components

  • Average Team Elo: Mean Elo rating of all participating teams. Higher average means stronger field.
  • Competitive Balance: How evenly matched the teams are. Tournaments where many teams can compete for the title score higher.
  • Prestige Score: Based on the number and quality of elite teams (1700+ Elo) in the tournament field.
  • Team Count: Larger tournaments with more teams demonstrate broader competitive appeal.
  • Match Count: More matches provide more data points for reliable ratings.