College Club Men's State Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 2 · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score

Rankings last updated:

#StateScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
26 Alabama 40.84 4 6 2 U Alabama
27 Oklahoma 38.48 3 7 1 U Oklahoma
28 Arizona 37.28 4 7 1 Grand Canyon U
29 West Virginia 36.63 1 2 1 W Virginia
30 Louisiana 36.49 5 7 1 Louisiana St U
31 Delaware 36.27 1 2 1 U Delaware
32 Georgia 36.24 11 13 1 Georgia Tech
33 Kentucky 36.04 2 4 1 U Kentucky
34 Kansas 35.99 5 8 1 U Kansas
35 Rhode Island 33.26 7 8 1 U Rhode Island
36 Connecticut 32.77 11 12 1 U Connecticut
37 Arkansas 32.75 2 3 1 U Arkansas
38 Tennessee 32.64 4 5 1 U Tennessee
39 Montana 31.82 2 3 1 Montana St U
40 Nebraska 30.72 3 4 1 U Nebraska
41 Maine 24.22 6 8 Bowdoin
42 Nevada 22.26 2 4 U Nevada-Reno
43 BC 20.1 3 4 U British Columbia
44 District of Columbia 19.79 4 5 American U
45 Vermont 15.46 3 3 Middlebury
46 New Hampshire 14.86 3 3 S New Hampshire
47 South Dakota 13.49 2 2 South Dakota St U
48 ON 13.29 1 1 U Ottawa Canada
49 Mississippi 12.02 2 2 U Mississippi
50 New Mexico 11.59 1 1 U New Mexico
← Previous12345Next →

State Ranking Methodology

State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)

SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.