College Club Men's State Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 2 · States ranked by composite volleyball strength score

#StateScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
26 Washington 49.52 8 13 1 U Washington
27 Nebraska 49.42 3 4 2 U Nebraska
28 New Jersey 47.16 9 12 1 Rutgers-New Brnwk
29 Maryland 45.99 6 8 1 U Maryland
30 Kentucky 45.48 2 4 1 U Kentucky
31 Kansas 45.28 4 7 1 U Kansas
32 Oklahoma 45.27 5 8 1 U Oklahoma
33 Georgia 45.04 11 13 1 Georgia Tech
34 Tennessee 44.94 4 5 1 U Tennessee
35 Arkansas 44.44 2 3 1 U Arkansas
36 Arizona 44.2 4 7 1 U Arizona
37 Rhode Island 42.66 7 8 1 Brown
38 Maine 41.77 6 8 1 U Southern Maine
39 Montana 40.78 2 3 1 Montana St U
40 BC 28.98 3 4 U British Columbia
41 West Virginia 28.5 1 2 W Virginia
42 ON 27.99 1 1 U Ottawa Canada
43 Delaware 27.33 1 2 U Delaware
44 New Hampshire 25.47 3 3 S New Hampshire
45 Nevada 24.84 2 4 U Nevada-Reno
46 District of Columbia 24.59 3 4 American U
47 Vermont 21.97 3 3 Middlebury
48 South Dakota 20.51 2 2 South Dakota St
49 Mississippi 18.55 2 2 U Mississippi
50 New Mexico 17.97 1 1 U New Mexico
← Previous12345Next →

State Ranking Methodology

State Volleyball Power Score (SVPS)

SVPS = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs. Measures the ceiling of a state's volleyball programs.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile). Rewards volleyball infrastructure.
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average. Prevents small-sample inflation.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to largest state. Rewards deep volleyball ecosystems.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs. Rewards high concentration of quality programs.