Youth Boys USAV Region Volleyball Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 2 · USAV regions ranked by composite club strength score

Rankings last updated:

#RegionScoreClubsTeamsElite ClubsTop Club
26 Southern
SO
 51.62 21 68 2 C2 Attack
27 Hoosier
HO
 50.82 9 69 2 Academy
28 Lone Star
LS
 50.15 15 54 2 HVA
29 Puget Sound
PS
 49.14 12 45 2 SNVF
30 Palmetto
PM
 49.11 17 40 2 Apex
31 Columbia Empire
CE
 48.96 17 45 2 AJAXVB
32 Great Plains
GP
 47.64 9 23 2 HAVC
33 Moku O Keawe
MK
 47.55 5 11 2 PILIPA'A
34 Heart of America
HA
 45.06 27 67 1 MAVS
35 Oklahoma
OK
 41.6 4 12 1 Kaizen Boys
36 Sun Country
SU
 33 5 14 E3
37 Evergreen
EV
 32.32 11 34 IDVB
38 Iowa
IA
 30.68 13 25 Ohana
39 Delta
DE
 20 1 3 Ozark Boys
40 Gulf Coast
GC
 19 4 5 PEVC
41 Bayou
BY
 14.46 3 4 Bayou Boys
← Previous1234

Region Ranking Methodology

Region Volleyball Power Score

Score = (Peak Quality × 0.25) + (Elite Strength × 0.25) + (Adjusted Average × 0.20) + (Breadth × 0.20) + (Elite Density × 0.10). All components normalized to 0-100 scale.

Components

  • Peak Quality (25%): Average score of top 3 clubs in the region.
  • Elite Strength (25%): Number of elite clubs (above national 75th percentile).
  • Adjusted Average (20%): Bayesian-adjusted average club score blended with national average.
  • Breadth (20%): Total club count relative to the largest region.
  • Elite Density (10%): Percentage of elite clubs.

Region Assignment

Each club is bucketed into a USAV region using its AES TeamCode suffix (the 2-letter region code), with the state's default region as a fallback for clubs without AES data.