College Club Men's Volleyball Tournament Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 4 · Ranked by Tournament Competitiveness Index (TCI)

Rankings last updated:

#TournamentTCITeamsMatchesAvg EloLocation
76 Conference Matches Kutztown / MACVC 25.68 15 24 1505 Kutztown,PA
77 MWVC Colorado Region Event - Mens / MWVC 25.67 20 30 1469 Greeley,CO
78 ECVA D2 Mens Southeast Championship / ECVA 25.59 14 26 1513 Tallahassee,FL
79 D3-Regionals-DayOne / NECVL 25.39 10 18 1558 Kingston,RI
80 ECVA D2 Central East Division Play Date / ECVA 25.38 13 27 1496 College Park,MD
82 D2-Regionals-DayOne / NECVL 25.16 10 20 1549 Kingston,RI
81 MWPVC Men's D1 Central Regional / MWPVC 25.16 8 18 1527 St. Louis,MO
83 Conference Matches WCU / MACVC 25.13 12 22 1504 West Chester,PA
84 Demon Deacon Invitational / Wake Forest U 24.99 8 18 1507 Winston-Salem,NC
85 InterDivisional-D3-First / NECVL 24.8 7 17 1512 Worcester,MA
86 NCCVL DI North Regionals / NCCVL 24.78 5 10 1602 Davis,CA
87 Winter Warm Up: EAST (Men) / PIVA 24.67 10 35 1476 Boise,ID
88 Mountaineer Invitational / W Virginia U 24.65 7 0 1488 Morgantown,WV
89 MWPVC Men's D1 West Regional / MWPVC 24.57 8 18 1471 Lincoln,NE
90 InterDivisional-D2-Second / NECVL 24.36 9 21 1489 Smithfield,RI
91 InterDivisional-D3-Second / NECVL 24.29 9 21 1496 Springfield,MA
92 404 Invitational / Georgia State U 24.23 9 27 1481 Atlanta,GA
93 MWPVC Men's D2 Championships / MWPVC 24.04 14 20 1476 Mattoon,IL
94 ECVA D2 North East Playdate / Syracuse U C 23.88 10 24 1467 Syracuse,NY
95 InterDivisional-D1-First / NECVL 23.85 10 23 1456 New Haven,CT
96 ALL STAR INVITATIONAL - MEN / PIVA 23.81 12 28 1471 Seattle,WA
97 ECVA D2 Central East Division Tournament / ECVA 23.8 7 14 1522 College Park,MD
98 MWVC Colorado Mens North Event / MWVC 23.69 13 23 1459 Denver,CO
99 ECVA D1 Mens Southeast Divisional Play / ECVA 23.68 8 19 1494 Tampa,FL
100 MACVC Divisionals / MACVC 23.48 11 9 1511 West Chester,PA
← Previous1234567Next →

Tournament Competitiveness Index (TCI) Methodology

The TCI score measures overall tournament quality on a 0-100 scale, combining team strength, competitive balance, and prestige factors.

Score Components

  • Average Team Elo: Mean Elo rating of all participating teams. Higher average means stronger field.
  • Competitive Balance: How evenly matched the teams are. Tournaments where many teams can compete for the title score higher.
  • Prestige Score: Based on the number and quality of elite teams (1700+ Elo) in the tournament field.
  • Team Count: Larger tournaments with more teams demonstrate broader competitive appeal.
  • Match Count: More matches provide more data points for reliable ratings.