2025-2026 Season · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens NJCAA Men's Volleyball Rankings cover every NJCAA men's volleyball program (PrestoSports does not split NJCAA men's into divisions) using a single ELO pool updated after every match. Data is sourced from NJCAA / PrestoSports box scores. The current #1 ranked team is UCNJ with a 1966 Elo rating and 155-5 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UCNJ | 1966 | 155-5 | 97% | all | |
| 2 | Monroe University - Bronx | 1959 | 140-2 | 99% | all | |
| 3 | Nassau Community College | 1939 | 120-2 | 98% | all | |
| 4 | Finger Lakes Community College | 1937 | 117-1 | 99% | all | |
| 5 | Monroe University | 1926 | 111-5 | 96% | all | |
| 6 | Harcum College | 1921 | 112-12 | 90% | all | |
| 7 | Atlantic Cape Community College | 1920 | 111-5 | 96% | all | |
| 8 | Borough of Manhattan Community College | 1913 | 104-2 | 98% | all | |
| 9 | Ocean County College | 1910 | 103-3 | 97% | all | |
| 10 | Bryant & Stratton College (WI) | 1908 | 99-3 | 97% | all | |
| 11 | College of DuPage | 1904 | 95-0 | 100% | all | |
| 12 | Passaic County Community College | 1900 | 104-11 | 90% | all | |
| 13 | Brookdale Community College | 1898 | 100-7 | 93% | all | |
| 14 | Middlesex College | 1884 | 95-18 | 84% | all | |
| 15 | Kingsborough Community College | 1852 | 75-7 | 91% | all | |
| 16 | Northampton Community College | 1844 | 74-11 | 87% | all | |
| 17 | Hostos Community College | 1812 | 58-8 | 88% | all | |
| 18 | Roxbury Community College | 1795 | 52-8 | 87% | all |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.
New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.
Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.